JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1992; 75:753-756
© 1992 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, S.
Right arrow Articles by Weissman, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, S.
Right arrow Articles by Weissman, A. B.

Adverse Effects of Epidural 0.03% Bupivacaine During Analgesia After Cesarean Section

Shaul Cohen, MD, David Amar, MD, Carol B. Pantuck, BA, Eugene J. Pantuck, MD, and Allan B. Weissman, BA

Departments of Anesthesiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, and Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York

To develop a regimen that would provide good analgesia after cesarean section with minimal side effects in the setting of prolonged (>24 h) epidural infusion, buprenorphine or fentanyl was combined with 0.03% bupivacaine in a double-blind study of 23 parturients. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: group I (n = 12), patient-controlled analgesia by epidural infusion of buprenorphine (3 µ/mL) with 0.03% bupivacaine; group II (n = 11), patient-controlled analgesia by epidural infusion of fentanyl (2 µ/mL) with 0.03% bupivacaine. Plasma for determination of opioid concentrations was obtained at intermittent intervals. Pain relief was similar and satisfactory in both groups. The median overall satisfaction score was higher (10.0 vs 7.5; P < 0.03) for group II. Pruritus was mild in most patients. Nausea and vomiting, which were most disturbing to the patients, were seen only with buprenorphine. No patient had a respiratory rate of <12 breaths/min. Mean plasma opioid concentrations did not exceed 1 ng/mL during the study. However, four patients (33%) in group I and six patients (55%) in group II experienced sensory loss in the lower extremities, which made ambulation difficult. One patient in each group developed extensive pressure blisters on both heels. These complications led us to terminate the study. We conclude that 0.03% bupivacaine used in combination with an opioid in prolonged epidural infusions produces a high incidence of sensory loss in the lower extremities and is unsuitable for situations in which early ambulation is desired.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
R. G. Wheatley, S. A. Schug, and D. Watson
Safety and efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2001; 87(1): 47 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
S. Datta and S. Jain
Pain Management
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 1997; 1(3): 264 - 277.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 1992 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1992 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.