JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1992; 75:876-879
© 1992 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manschot, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Erdmann, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manschot, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Erdmann, W.

Propofol Requirements for Induction of Anesthesia in Children of Different Age Groups

H. Jan Manschot, MD, Anneke E. E. Meursing, MD, PhD, Peter Axt, MB, Geert O. Byttebier, MSc, and Wilhelm Erdmann, MD, PhD

Department of Anesthesia, Erasmus University (Division of Pediatric Anesthesia), Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

To demonstrate any age-related differences in propofol requirements for induction of anesthesia, 150 healthy children aged 3–5 yr (n = 50), 6–9 yr (n = 50), and 10–15 yr (n = 50) scheduled for outpatient surgery were randomly assigned to receive an induction dose of propofol of 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, or 3.5 mg/kg. To limit pain during injection, alfentanil (5 µg/kg) was administered before the propofol. Patients were classified as asleep or not asleep 30 s after the propofol. Incidence of excitation, injection pain, and apnea during induction of anesthesia were noted; arterial blood pressure and heart rate were recorded for 5 min after induction. More than 95% of the children were asleep in the dose groups receiving ≥2.5 mg/kg. The number of patients falling asleep after receiving 1.5 mg/kg of propofol increased significantly with increasing age (P < 0.05); the difference between the oldest and the youngest age groups was the most significant (P < 0.05). Significant decreases in mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate occurred after induction in all dose and age groups without any systematic intergroup differences. Apnea occurred more frequently in older children (P < 0.01) and with larger doses (P < 0.01). The most frequent side effect was erythema near the site of injection, and its occurrence was dose dependent. The authors conclude that 2.5 mg/kg of propofol, if preceded by 5 µg/kg of alfentanil, is an appropriate induction dose for children aged 3–15 yr and that the sleep response to 1.5 mg/kg is more in older children.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. E. Morey, J. H. Modell, D. Shekhawat, D. O. Shah, B. Klatt, G. P. Thomas, F. A. Kero, M. M. Booth, and D. M. Dennis
Anesthetic Properties of a Propofol Microemulsion in Dogs
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2006; 103(4): 882 - 887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 1992 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1992 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.