JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1992; 75:972-976
© 1992 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karlsten, R.
Right arrow Articles by Gordh, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karlsten, R.
Right arrow Articles by Gordh, T., Jr.

R-Phenylisopropyl-Adenosine Increases Spinal Cord Blood Flow After Intrathecal Injection in the Rat

Rolf Karlsten, MD, Jens D. Kristensen, MD, and Torsten Gordh, Jr., PhD

Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden

Abstract

The Al-adenosine receptor agonist, R-phenyliso-propyl-adenosine (R-PIA), demonstrated antinociceptive properties in animal studies after intrathecal administration. In the evaluation of a drug for possible spinal injection in humans, the effects of intrathecal R-PIA on spinal cord blood flow (SCBF) were investigated using the laser-Doppler flow-metry technique in anesthetized rats. In low doses (0.1–1 nmol), no change in SCBF was recorded, whereas larger doses (10–100 nmol) caused a significant increase in SCBF. No change in systemic arterial blood pressure could be seen, except for a decrease after administration of the largest dose of R-PIA (100 nmol). It is concluded that R-PIA in doses of 10 nmol and larger induces an increase in SCBF after intrathecal injection in anesthetized rats and that an increase in blood flow is seen before any effect on the systemic circulation is detected. It can also be deduced that the antinociceptive effects of R-PIA after intrathecal injection are not a consequence of spinal ischemia and that disturbances in local blood flow cannot be expected to constitute a neurotoxic factor.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. J. Gan and A. S. Habib
Adenosine as a Non-Opioid Analgesic in the Perioperative Setting
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2007; 105(2): 487 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Belfrage, M. Segerdahl, S. Arner, and A. Sollevi
The Safety and Efficacy of Intrathecal Adenosine in Patients with Chronic Neuropathic Pain
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 1999; 89(1): 136 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 1992 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1992 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.