Anesthesia & Analgesia, Vol 81, 1263-1268, Copyright © 1995 by International Anesthesia Research Society

GENERAL ARTICLES

Decreases in anesthesia-controlled time cannot permit one additional surgical operation to be reliably scheduled during the workday

F Dexter, S Coffin and JH Tinker
Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242, USA.

We tested whether anesthesiologists can decrease operating room (OR) costs by working more quickly. Anesthesia-controlled time (ACT) was defined as the sum of 1) the time starting when the patient enters an OR until preparation or surgical positioning can begin plus 2) the time starting when the dressing is finished and ending when the patient leaves the OR. Case time was defined as the time starting when one patient undergoing an operation leaves an OR and ending when the next patient undergoing the same operation leaves the OR. An actual case series was constructed of 709 consecutive patients who underwent one of 11 elective operations at a tertiary care center. Statistical analysis of measured OR times showed that ACt would have to be decreased by more than 100% to permit one additional scheduled, short (30-min) operation to be performed in an OR during an 8-h workday after a prior series of cases, each lasting more than 45 min. Anesthesiologists alone cannot reasonably decrease case times sufficiently to permit one extra case to be reliably scheduled during a workday. Methods to decrease ACT (e.g., using preoperative intravenous catheter teams, procedure rooms, and/or shorter acting drugs) may simply increase costs.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Dexter and R. E. Wachtel Economic, Educational, and Policy Perspectives on the Preincision Operating Room Period Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2006; 103(4): 919 - 921. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Davis, A. Escobar, J. Ehrenwerth, G. A. Watrous, G. S. Fisch, Z. N. Kain, and P. G. Barash Resident Teaching Versus the Operating Room Schedule: An Independent Observer-Based Study of 1558 Cases Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2006; 103(4): 932 - 937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Sokal, D. L. Craft, Y. Chang, W. S. Sandberg, and D. L. Berger Maximizing Operating Room and Recovery Room Capacity in an Era of Constrained Resources Arch Surg, April 1, 2006; 141(4): 389 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Cendan and M. Good Interdisciplinary Work Flow Assessment and Redesign Decreases Operating Room Turnover Time and Allows for Additional Caseload Arch Surg, January 1, 2006; 141(1): 65 - 69. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Schuster, T. Standl, H. Reissmann, L. Kuntz, and J. S. am Esch Reduction of Anesthesia Process Times After the Introduction of an Internal Transfer Pricing System for Anesthesia Services Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2005; 101(1): 187 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Schuster, A. Gottschalk, J. Berger, and T. Standl A Retrospective Comparison of Costs for Regional and General Anesthesia Techniques Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2005; 100(3): 786 - 794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Dexter, A. E. Abouleish, R. H. Epstein, C. W. Whitten, and D. A. Lubarsky Use of Operating Room Information System Data to Predict the Impact of Reducing Turnover Times on Staffing Costs Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2003; 97(4): 1119 - 1126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. K. Moore, E. W. Moore, R. A. Elliott, A. S. St Leger, K. Payne, and J. Kerr Propofol and halothane versus sevoflurane in paediatric day-case surgery: induction and recovery characteristics{dagger} Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2003; 90(4): 461 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Lesperance and C. D'Errico Efficiency of the Operating Room vs the Short Procedure Room: Squeezing the Balloon Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, April 1, 2003; 129(4): 427 - 428. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Abouleish, D. S. Prough, M. H. Zornow, J. Hughes, C. W. Whitten, L. A. Conlay, J. J. Abate, and T. E. Horn The Impact of Longer-Than-Average Anesthesia Times on the Billing of Academic Anesthesiology Departments Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2001; 93(6): 1537 - 1543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Jackson and P. S. Myles Part II: Total Episode Costs in a Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Effectiveness of Four Anesthetics Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2000; 91(5): 1170 - 1175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. I. E. Puura, M. G. F. Rorarius, P. Manninen, S. Hopput, and G. A. Baer The Costs of Intense Neuromuscular Block for Anesthesia During Endolaryngeal Procedures Due to Waiting Time Anesth. Analg., June 1, 1999; 88(6): 1335 - 1335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Dexter and A. Macario Decrease in Case Duration Required to Complete an Additional Case During Regularly Scheduled Hours in an Operating Room Suite: A Computer Simulation Study Anesth. Analg., January 1, 1999; 88(1): 72 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999