|
Anesthesia & Analgesia, Vol 87, 4-10, Copyright © 1998 by International Anesthesia Research Society
Automated electrocardiograph ST segment trending monitors: accuracy in detecting myocardial ischemia
JM Leung, A Voskanian, WH Bellows and D Pastor
Department of Anesthesia, University of California-San Francisco, USA. jmleung@itsa.ucsf.edu
Continuous automated ST segment trending devices (ST trending monitors) are
included in most new operating room electrocardiography (ECG) monitors to
facilitate ischemia detection, but their efficacy is not well validated.
Therefore, we compared their accuracy with that of Holter ECG recorders in
detecting ST segment changes (both analyzed offline) in 94 patients
undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Holter ECG tapes were
analyzed using standard criteria for determining ECG ischemic episodes,
which were compared with those measured by the ST trending monitors.
Overall, 42 ischemic episodes were detected by using the Holter monitor in
30 patients. Of the 42 episodes, 38 (90%) were also detected by the ST
trending monitors. Sixteen episodes of ST segment deviation were detected
by the ST trending monitors, but not by the Holter. The sensitivity of the
three ST trending monitors in detecting ischemia was 75%, 78%, and 60% for
the Marquette (Milwaukee, WI), Hewlett Packard (Andover, MA), and Datex
(Helsinki, Finland) monitors, respectively, with a specificity of 89%, 71%,
and 69% relative to the Holter. Compared with the HP and Datex monitors,
the Marquette monitor has the best agreement with the Holter (K 0.64).
Conditions in which ST trending monitors may be inaccurate were identified
and included the appearance of small R-wave amplitude, drifting baseline,
and during periods of conduction abnormalities and pacing. We conclude that
ST trending monitors have only moderate sensitivity and specificity (<
75% overall) in accurately detecting ECG ST segment changes compared with
Holter ECG recordings. Therefore, sole reliance on ST trending monitors for
the detection of myocardial ischemia may be insufficient. Implications:
Using Holter recordings as the reference standard for detection of
intraoperative ischemia, ST trending monitors were found to have overall
sensitivity and specificity of 74% and 73%, respectively. Several
conditions contribute to the inaccuracy of ST trend monitoring, and
additional modification of their performance is necessary to achieve better
agreement with the Holter analysis.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association Task Force on Practice, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interve, Society for Vascular Medicine, Society for Vascular Surgery, L. A. Fleisher, et al.
2009 ACCF/AHA Focused Update on Perioperative Beta Blockade Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
November 24, 2009;
54(22):
e13 - e118.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
2007 WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. L. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, et al.
2009 ACCF/AHA Focused Update on Perioperative Beta Blockade Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
Circulation,
November 24, 2009;
120(21):
e169 - e276.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Authors/Task Force Members, D. Poldermans, J. J. Bax, E. Boersma, S. De Hert, E. Eeckhout, G. Fowkes, B. Gorenek, M. G. Hennerici, B. Iung, et al.
Guidelines for pre-operative cardiac risk assessment and perioperative cardiac management in non-cardiac surgery: The Task Force for Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment and Perioperative Cardiac Management in Non-cardiac Surgery of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and endorsed by the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA)
Eur. Heart J.,
November 2, 2009;
30(22):
2769 - 2812.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. L. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, J. R. Kersten, et al.
ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
October 23, 2007;
50(17):
e159 - e242.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. L. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, J. R. Kersten, et al.
ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery)
Circulation,
October 23, 2007;
116(17):
e418 - e500.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. Shanewise
How to Reliably Detect Ischemia in the Intensive Care Unit and Operating Room
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia,
March 1, 2006;
10(1):
101 - 109.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. G. Santambrogio, S. Mencherini, M. Fuardo, F. Caramella, and A. Braschi
The Surgical Patient with Brugada Syndrome: A Four-Case Clinical Experience
Anesth. Analg.,
May 1, 2005;
100(5):
1263 - 1266.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. N. Spackman, M. D. Abel, and T. T. Schlegel
Twelve-Lead High-Frequency QRS Electrocardiography During Anesthesia in Healthy Subjects
Anesth. Analg.,
April 1, 2005;
100(4):
1043 - 1047.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Leung, W. H. Bellows, and D. Pastor
Does Intraoperative Evaluation of Left Ventricular Contractile Reserve Predict Myocardial Viability? A Clinical Study Using Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Anesth. Analg.,
September 1, 2004;
99(3):
647 - 654.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kawahito, H. Kitahata, K. Tanaka, J. Nozaki, and S. Oshita
Dynamic QRS-complex and ST-segment monitoring by continuous vectorcardiography during carotid endarterectomy
Br. J. Anaesth.,
February 1, 2003;
90(2):
142 - 147.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. F. Williams
Monitoring Perioperative Ischemia
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia,
July 1, 2001;
5(2):
148 - 153.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Kaneko, Y. Saito, Y. Hikawa, K. Yasuda, and K. Makita
Dose-dependent prophylactic effect of nicorandil, an ATP-sensitive potassium channel opener, on intra-operative myocardial ischaemia in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery
Br. J. Anaesth.,
March 1, 2001;
86(3):
332 - 337.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. B. Howie, R. Dzwonczyk, and T. D. McSweeney
An Evaluation of a New Two-Electrode Myocardial Electrical Impedance Monitor for Detecting Myocardial Ischemia
Anesth. Analg.,
January 1, 2001;
92(1):
12 - 18.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. J. Woehlck, L. A. Connolly, M. P. Cinquegrani, M. B. Dunning III, and R. G. Hoffmann
Acute Smoking Increases ST Depression in Humans During General Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg.,
October 1, 1999;
89(4):
856 - 856.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|