| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||


Departments of
*Anesthesiology,
Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, and
Physiology I, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany; and
§Department of Anesthesiology, LKH Klagenfurt, Austria
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. W. Koppert, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Krankenhausstr. 12, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany. Address e-mail to koppert{at}physiologie1.uni-erlangen.de
The objective of this study was to evaluate direct peripheral analgesic effects of morphine using a peripheral model of hyperalgesia and the technique of IV regional anesthesia (IVRA), thus allowing the differentiation between central and peripheral mechanisms of action. Two spots on the ventral sides of both forearms in 12 volunteers were irradiated with ultraviolet (UV)-B to induce thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia. One day after the induction of the inflammatory reaction, 40 mL of morphine hydrochloride 0.01% was administered via IVRA. Calibrated heat and phasic mechanical stimuli were applied to differentially determine impairments of tactile and nociceptive perception. Touch and phasic mechanical stimuli of noxious intensity to normal skin did not reveal altered responsiveness caused by morphine. In contrast, the administration of morphine significantly increased heat pain thresholds in the UV-Bpretreated skin areas. The peripheral antihyperalgesic effects of morphine were demonstrated only in inflamed skin areas. Direct central analgesic effects were ruled out by the lack of measurable plasma concentrations of morphine and its metabolites. Morphine 0.01% significantly diminished thermal, but not mechanical, hyperalgesia by a peripheral mode of action, which suggests inhibition of effector pathways leading to heat, but not mechanical, sensitization.
Implications: The peripheral analgesic effects of morphine were studied using modified IV regional anesthesia. When administered 1 day after the induction of dermal inflammation, morphine 0.01% diminished heat, but not primary mechanical, hyperalgesia. Therefore, suppression of mechanical hyperalgesia seen in previous studies could be predominantly due to inhibition of secondary (central) mechanical hyperalgesia.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. D. Drummond The Effect of Peripheral Opioid Block and Body Cooling on Sensitivity to Heat in Capsaicin-Treated Skin Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2000; 90(4): 923 - 927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Koppert, S. Zeck, J. A. Blunk, M. Schmelz, R. Likar, and R. Sittl The Effects of Intradermal Fentanyl and Ketamine on Capsaicin-Induced Secondary Hyperalgesia and Flare Reaction Anesth. Analg., December 1, 1999; 89(6): 1521 - 1521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kress and S. Guenther Role of [Ca2+]i in the ATP-Induced Heat Sensitization Process of Rat Nociceptive Neurons J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1999; 81(6): 2612 - 2619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|