Anesth Analg 1999;88:128-133
© 1999 International Anesthesia Research Society
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MANAGEMENT
Epidural Analgesia with Local Anesthetics After Abdominal Surgery: Earlier Motor Recovery with 0.2% Ropivacaine Than 0.175% Bupivacaine
Gerhard Brodner, MD, PhD,
Norbert Mertes, MD,
Hugo Van Aken, MD, PhD, FRCA,
Esther Pogatzki, MD,
Hartmut Buerkle, MD,
Marco A. Marcus, MD, PhD, and
Thomas Mollhoff, MD, PhD
Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, Germany
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. H. Van Aken, Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, Germany, Albert-Schweitzerstr. 33, D-48129 Münster, Germany.
The aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was to compare pain relief, side effects, and ability to ambulate during epidural anesthesia with ropivacaine 0.2% plus sufentanil versus bupivacaine 0.175% plus sufentanil after major gastrointestinal surgery. Epidural catheters were inserted at T811, and 30 µg of sufentanil with 15 mL of ropivacaine 0.75% (Group 1, n = 42) or bupivacaine 0.5% (Group 2, n = 44) was injected. General anesthesia was induced, a continuous epidural infusion (5 mL/h) was then begun with 1 µg/mL sufentanil plus ropivacaine 0.2% (Group 1) or bupivacaine 0.175% (Group 2). Postoperatively, the infusion rate was adjusted to individual requirements. Patients were also able to receive additional 2-mL bolus doses every 20 min. Demographic data (except for gender and height), analgesia, drug dosage, and side-effects, including motor blockade (Bromage score), were similar in both groups, but mobilization recovered more quickly in Group 1. Gender, age, ASA physical status, duration of surgery, and intraoperative blood loss had no effect on mobilization. We conclude that epidural analgesia is effective and safe with both regimens. There is not necessarily a correlation between the Bromage score and the desired outcome of mobilization. The ability to walk postoperatively is hastened if ropivacaine is used instead of bupivacaine.
Implications: Regarding pain relief and side effects, epidural analgesia with ropivacaine 0.2% and sufentanil 1 µg/mL yields pain scores and pain intensity comparable to those for the well evaluated combination of bupivacaine 0.175% and sufentanil 1 µg/mL. However, earlier recovery of the ability to walk unassisted in patients receiving the combination of ropivacaine and sufentanil may result in their earlier rehabilitation.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Schuster, A. Gottschalk, M. Freitag, and T. Standl
Cost Drivers in Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management After Major Surgery
Anesth. Analg.,
March 1, 2004;
98(3):
708 - 713.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Senard, A. Kaba, M. J. Jacquemin, L. M. Maquoi, M.-P. N. Geortay, P. D. Honore, M. L. Lamy, and J. L. Joris
Epidural Levobupivacaine 0.1% or Ropivacaine 0.1% Combined with Morphine Provides Comparable Analgesia After Abdominal Surgery
Anesth. Analg.,
February 1, 2004;
98(2):
389 - 394.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Senard, J. L. Joris, D. Ledoux, P. J. Toussaint, B. Lahaye-Goffart, and M. L. Lamy
A Comparison of 0.1% and 0.2% Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine Combined with Morphine for Postoperative Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia After Major Abdominal Surgery
Anesth. Analg.,
August 1, 2002;
95(2):
444 - 449.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Pouzeratte, J. M. Delay, G. Brunat, G. Boccara, C. Vergne, S. Jaber, J. M. Fabre, P. Colson, and C. Mann
Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia After Abdominal Surgery: Ropivacaine Versus Bupivacaine
Anesth. Analg.,
December 1, 2001;
93(6):
1587 - 1592.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Jorgensen, J. S. Fomsgaard, J. Dirks, J. Wetterslev, B. Andreasson, and J. B. Dahl
Effect of epidural bupivacaine vs combined epidural bupivacaine and morphine on gastrointestinal function and pain after major gynaecological surgery
Br. J. Anaesth.,
November 1, 2001;
87(5):
727 - 732.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Jin and F. Chung
Minimizing perioperative adverse events in the elderly{dagger}
Br. J. Anaesth.,
October 1, 2001;
87(4):
608 - 624.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. S. Hodgson and S. S. Liu
A Comparison of Ropivacaine with Fentanyl to Bupivacaine with Fentanyl for Postoperative Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia
Anesth. Analg.,
April 1, 2001;
92(4):
1024 - 1028.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Borgeat, F. Kalberer, H. Jacob, Y. A. Ruetsch, and C. Gerber
Patient-Controlled Interscalene Analgesia With Ropivacaine 0.2% versus Bupivacaine 0.15% After Major Open Shoulder Surgery: The Effects on Hand Motor Function
Anesth. Analg.,
January 1, 2001;
92(1):
218 - 223.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Brodner, N. Mertes, H. Van Aken, T. Mollhoff, M. Zahl, S. Wirtz, M. A. E. Marcus, and H. Buerkle
What Concentration of Sufentanil Should be Combined with Ropivacaine 0.2% wt/vol for Postoperative Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia?
Anesth. Analg.,
March 1, 2000;
90(3):
649 - 657.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|