JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jellish, W. S. Articles by Slogoff, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jellish, W. S. Articles by Slogoff, S.

---

CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIA

Somatosensory Evoked Potential Monitoring Used to Compare the Effect of Three Asymmetric Sternal Retractors on Brachial Plexus Function

W. Scott Jellish, MD, PhD^*, Bradford Blakeman, MD, Patricia Warf, RN^*, and Stephen Slogoff, MD^*

Departments of *Anesthesiology and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois

Address correspondence and reprint requests to W. Scott Jellish, MD, PhD, Loyola University Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, 2160 South First Ave., Maywood, IL 60153.

We compared the effect of three different asymmetric sternal retractors on brachial plexus dysfunction using intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs). We studied 60 patients undergoing coronary bypass and internal mammary harvest. Assessment of brachial plexus function was performed pre- and postoperatively. Patients were assigned the use of a Pittman^TM (MN Scientific Instruments Inc., Minneapolis, MN), Rultract^TM (Rultract Inc., Cleveland, OH) , or Delacroix-Chevalier^TM (Delacroix-Chevalier, Paris, France) asymmetric sternal retractor for internal mammary exposure. SSEP changes from baseline during asymmetric retractor use and removal were determined, and average changes were compared among the retractor groups. Patient demographics and baseline SSEP values were similar. Fewer patients in the Delacroix-Chevalier^TM group had decreases in SSEP amplitudes after retractor placement. Of the patients in the Rultract^TM and Pittman^TM groups, 45% and 25%, respectively, had amplitude decreases of >50%, compared with only 5% of the Delacroix-Chevalier^TM patients. Three patients in both the Pittman^TM and Rultract^TM groups and one patient in the Delacroix-Chevalier^TM group suffered brachial plexus symptoms postoperatively. We conclude that the Delacroix-Chevalier^TM retractor is associated with less neurophysiologic evidence of brachial plexus dysfunction during asymmetric sternal retraction compared with either the Pittman^TM or Rultract^TM sternal retractors.

Implications: We used somatosensory evoked potentials to assess the effect of several different asymmetric sternal retractors on brachial plexus dysfunction and to determine which produced the least evidence of nerve damage during surgical exposure of the internal mammary artery.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. L. Onwere, T. N. Spackman, and R. L. Click Intraoperative Hypoxemia from Compression of the Right Pulmonary Artery Caused by a Sternal Retractor Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2008; 106(2): 415 - 416. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Durham and J. P. Gold Late Complications of Cardiac Surgery Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 535 - 548. [Full Text]

				M. A. Villavicencio, T. M. Sundt III, R. C. Daly, J. A. Dearani, C. G.A. McGregor, C. J. Mullany, T. A. Orszulak, F. J. Puga, and H. V. Schaff Cardiac Surgery in Patients With Body Mass Index of 50 or Greater Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 83(4): 1403 - 1411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. R. Kamel, E. T. Drum, S. A. Koch, J. A. Whitten, J. P. Gaughan, R. E. Barnette, and W. W. Wendling The use of somatosensory evoked potentials to determine the relationship between patient positioning and impending upper extremity nerve injury during spine surgery: a retrospective analysis. Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2006; 102(5): 1538 - 1542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. P. Grocott, J. A. Clark, H. M. Homi, and A. Sharma "Other" Neurologic Complications After Cardiac Surgery Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2004; 8(3): 213 - 226. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. M. Stecker Evoked Potentials during Cardiac and Major Vascular Operations Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, June 1, 2004; 8(2): 101 - 111. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. D. Sharma, C. L. Parmley, G. Sreeram, and H. P. Grocott Peripheral Nerve Injuries During Cardiac Surgery: Risk Factors, Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Prevention Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2000; 91(6): 1358 - 1369. [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999