This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (40) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fredman, B. Articles by Jedeikin, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fredman, B. Articles by Jedeikin, R.

---

REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MANAGEMENT

Epidural Steroids for Treating "Failed Back Surgery Syndrome": Is Fluoroscopy Really Necessary?

Departments of Anesthesiology and Intensive CareRadiology and Spine Surgery, Meir Hospital, Kfar Saba; and the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Robert Jedeikin, BSc, MB ChB, FFA(SA), Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Meir Hospital, Kfar Saba 44281, Israel.

Epidural steroids are commonly administered in the treatment of "failed back surgery syndrome." Because patient response is dependent on accurate steroid placement, fluoroscopic guidance has been advocated. However, because of ever-increasing medical expenditures, the cost-benefit of routine fluoroscopy should be critically evaluated. Therefore, 50 patients were enrolled into this institutional review board-approved, prospective, controlled, single-blinded study. At a predetermined intervertebral level, the epidural space was identified using an air loss of resistance technique. Thereafter, an epidural catheter was inserted 2 cm through the epidural needle. To determine the accuracy of the clinical placement, contrast medium was administered through the epidural catheter; antero-posterior and lateral lumbar spine radiographs were then obtained. The number of attempts required to successfully locate the epidural space, the reliability of the air loss of resistance technique in indicating successful epidural penetration in failed back surgery syndrome, the ability of the clinician to accurately predict the intervertebral space at which the epidural injection was performed, and the spread of contrast medium within the epidural space were recorded. A total of 48 epidurograms were performed. The number of attempts to successfully enter the epidural space was 2 ± 1. In 44 cases, the radiological studies confirmed the clinical impression that the epidural space had been successfully identified. In three patients, the epidural catheter was in the paravertebral tissue. One myelogram was recorded. In 25 patients, the epidural catheter did not pass through the predetermined intervertebral space. In 35 cases, the contrast medium did not reach the level of pathology.

Implications: The clinical sign of loss of resistance is a reliable indicator of epidural space penetration in most cases of "failed back surgery syndrome." However, surface anatomy is unreliable and may result in inaccurate steroid placement. Finally, despite accurate placement, the depot-steroid solution will spread to reach the level of pathology in only 26% of cases.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. S. Williams and S. P. Cohen Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Review of Anatomy, Diagnosis and Treatment Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2009; 108(5): 1662 - 1670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P Cohen, S. A Strassels, L. Foster, J. Marvel, K. Williams, M. Crooks, A. Gross, C. Kurihara, C. Nguyen, and N. Williams Comparison of fluoroscopically guided and blind corticosteroid injections for greater trochanteric pain syndrome: multicentre randomised controlled trial BMJ, April 14, 2009; 338(apr14_1): b1088 - b1088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Grider, R. E. Brown, and G. W. Colclough Perioperative Management of Patients with an Intrathecal Drug Delivery System for Chronic Pain Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2008; 107(4): 1393 - 1396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. S. Bartynski, S. Z. Grahovac, and W. E. Rothfus Incorrect Needle Position during Lumbar Epidural Steroid Administration: Inaccuracy of Loss of Air Pressure Resistance and Requirement of Fluoroscopy and Epidurography during Needle Insertion AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2005; 26(3): 502 - 505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Cohen, J. C. Narvaez, A. H. Lebovits, and M. P. Stojanovic Corticosteroid injections for trochanteric bursitis: is fluoroscopy necessary? A pilot study Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2005; 94(1): 100 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. G. Merrill, J. P. Rathmell, J. C. Rowlingson, M. P. Stojanovic, C. N. Sang, and S. P. Cohen Epidural Steroid Injections * Response Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2003; 96(3): 907 - 908. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Carrino, W. B. Morrison, L. Parker, M. E. Schweitzer, D. C. Levin, and J. H. Sunshine Spinal Injection Procedures: Volume, Provider Distribution, and Reimbursement in the U.S. Medicare Population from 1993 to 1999 Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 723 - 729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Cluff, A.-K. Mehio, S. P. Cohen, Y. Chang, C. N. Sang, and M. P. Stojanovic The Technical Aspects of Epidural Steroid Injections: A National Survey Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2002; 95(2): 403 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. H. Bajwa, C. Ho, A. Grush, J. Kleefield, and C. A. Warfield Discitis Associated with Pregnancy and Spinal Anesthesia Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2002; 94(2): 415 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C M Price, P D Rogers, A S J Prosser, and N K Arden Comparison of the caudal and lumbar approaches to the epidural space Ann Rheum Dis, November 1, 2000; 59(11): 879 - 882. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				L. Manchikanti, C. E. Bakhit, R. R. Pakanati, B. Fellows, B. Fredman, and R. Jedeikin Fluoroscopy Is Medically Necessary for the Performance of Epidural Steroids • Response Anesth. Analg., November 1, 1999; 89(5): 1330 - 1330. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Rowlingson Epidural Steroids in Treating Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Anesth. Analg., February 1, 1999; 88(2): 240 - 240. [Full Text] [PDF]