| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||



*Department of Anesthesiology and
The Interventional Centre, The National Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Ø. Klaastad, Department of Anesthesiology, The National Hospital (Rikshospitalet), Trondheimsveien 132, 0570 Oslo, Norway.
The infraclavicular brachial plexus block first described by Raj et al. was supposed to anesthetize all the main peripheral nerves of the brachial plexus without the risk of pneumothorax. However, in performing the block, we have had difficulties finding the nerves at the cord level. Therefore, we questioned whether the recommended needle direction (the "Raj line") guides the needle close enough to the cords. We therefore designed an anatomic study to answer this question and to assess the risks of entering the pleura and axillary vein. Ten volunteers were examined noninvasively in an open model magnetic resonance scanner. The Raj line deviated greatly from a defined location on the cords by a mean of 26 (range 1439) mm, always caudad, and posterior to the target in nine cases. Further, the needle trajectorys shortest distance to the pleura was only 10 (027) mm, and in one case, it hit the pleura. Finally, the Raj lines distance to the axillary vein was also short, 11 (018) mm. We conclude that a modification of the method is necessary to guide the needle closer to the cords and further away from the pleura and the axillary vein. A more lateral needle insertion seems beneficial.
Implications: Using a magnetic resonance scanner, the anatomical basis of Rajs infraclavicular method for brachial plexus blockade was examined in volunteers. The results show that the method should be modified to make it more precise and to provide less risk of complications.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Dingemans, S. R. Williams, G. Arcand, P. Chouinard, P. Harris, M. Ruel, and F. Girard Neurostimulation in Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Block: A Prospective Randomized Trial Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2007; 104(5): 1275 - 1280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Altintas Is the Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block the Best Approach? Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2006; 102(2): 653 - 653. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Arcand, S. R. Williams, P. Chouinard, D. Boudreault, P. Harris, M. Ruel, and F. Girard Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Versus Supraclavicular Block Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2005; 101(3): 886 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Klaastad, O. Smedby, T. Kjelstrup, and H.-J. Smith The Vertical Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Simulation Study Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2005; 101(1): 273 - 278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Minville, L. N'Guyen, C. Chassery, P. Zetlaoui, J.-C. Pourrut, C. Gris, B. Eychennes, D. Benhamou, and K. Samii A Modified Coracoid Approach to Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks Using a Double-Stimulation Technique in 300 Patients Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2005; 100(1): 263 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Klaastad, H.-J. Smith, O. Smedby, E. H. Winther-Larssen, P. Brodal, H. Breivik, and E. T. Fosse A Novel Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: The Lateral and Sagittal Technique, Developed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2004; 98(1): 252 - 256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Desroches The infraclavicular brachial plexus block by the coracoid approach is clinically effective: an observational study of 150 patients: [Le bloc infraclaviculaire du plexus brachial, realise par l'approche coracoide, est efficace sur le plan clinique : une etude prospective de 150 patients] Can J Anesth, March 1, 2003; 50(3): 253 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Klaastad, T. R. VadeBoncouer, T. Tillung, and O. Smedby An Evaluation of the Supraclavicular Plumb-Bob Technique for Brachial Plexus Block by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2003; 96(3): 862 - 867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Greher, G. Retzl, P. Niel, L. Kamolz, P. Marhofer, and S. Kapral Ultrasonographic assessment of topographic anatomy in volunteers suggests a modification of the infraclavicular vertical brachial plexus block{dagger} Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2002; 88(5): 632 - 636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Klaastad and O. Smedby The Supraclavicular Lateral Paravascular Approach for Brachial Plexus Regional Anesthesia: A Simulation Study Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2001; 93(2): 442 - 446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Klaastad, F. G. Lilleas, J. S. Rotnes, H. Breivik, and E. Fosse A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Modifications to the Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2000; 91(4): 929 - 933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Marhofer, C. Nasel, C. Sitzwohl, and S. Kapral Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Distribution of Local Anesthetic During the Three-In-One Block Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2000; 90(1): 119 - 119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|