JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow En Espanol
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (32)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Varrassi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Stefanini, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Varrassi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Stefanini, S.
Anesth Analg 1999;88:611
© 1999 International Anesthesia Research Society


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MANAGEMENT

A Double-Blinded Evaluation of Propacetamol Versus Ketorolac in Combination with Patient-Controlled Analgesia Morphine: Analgesic Efficacy and Tolerability After Gynecologic Surgery

Giustino Varrassi, MD*, Franco Marinangeli, MD*, Felice Agrò, MD{dagger}, Luigi Aloe, MD{ddagger}, Pompilio De Cillis, MD§, Aniello De Nicola, MD||, Francesco Giunta, MD, Stefano Ischia, MD**, Maria Ballabio, MD{dagger}{dagger}, and Silvia Stefanini, PhD{dagger}{dagger}

*Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila; {dagger}Department of Anesthesiology, University School of Medicine, LIU-Campus BioMedico, Rome; {ddagger}Anesthesiology Service, Regina Elena Institute, Rome; §Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, G. Rummo Hospital, Benevento; ||Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, S. Leonardo Hospital, Castellammare di Stabia; ¶Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa; **Institute of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Verona, Verona; and {dagger}{dagger}Medical Department, UPSAMEDICA, Milan, Italy

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Prof. Giustino Varrassi, Department of Anesthesiology, University of L’Aquila, Via Vetoio, Blocco 11, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy. Address e-mail to giuvarr{at}tin.it

We assessed the relative morphine consumption in a combined analgesic regimen (on-demand morphine plus the nonopioids propacetamol or ketorolac) after gynecologic surgery. Two hundred women randomly received two IV doses of propacetamol 2 g or ketorolac 30 mg in a double-blinded, double-dummy trial. Patients were monitored for 12 h, and the following efficacy variables were assessed: total dose of morphine, pain intensity, and global efficacy. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by the occurrence of adverse events, especially the presence and intensity of gastrointestinal symptoms. Hemostatic variables were measured 30 and 60 min after the first infusion; arterial blood pressure, heart and respiratory rates, sedation scores, and renal and hepatic function were also assessed. Total morphine requirements were not significantly different between the propacetamol (10.6 ± 4.8 mg) and ketorolac (10.2 ± 4.4 mg) groups. The evolution of pain intensity and the global efficacy also showed similar patterns in the two groups: 70.2% of patients in the propacetamol group rated the efficacy as "good/excellent" compared with 68.2% in the ketorolac group. There were no clinically significant changes in vital signs or laboratory values and no observed differences between the two groups, although ketorolac slightly, but not significantly, prolonged the bleeding time. Epigastric pain was present in 9% and 15% of patients receiving propacetamol and ketorolac, respectively. There were two adverse events in the propacetamol group and four in the ketorolac group. Propacetamol demonstrates an efficacy similar to that of ketorolac and has an excellent tolerability after gynecologic surgery.

Implications: Propacetamol and ketorolac, combined with patient-controlled analgesia morphine, show similar analgesic efficacy after gynecologic surgery. Morphine consumption and pain scores were comparable in the two studied groups. Propacetamol is as effective as ketorolac and has an excellent tolerability after gynecologic surgery.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. F. White
The Changing Role of Non-Opioid Analgesic Techniques in the Management of Postoperative Pain
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2005; 101(5S_Suppl): S5 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. L. Moller, G. I. Juhl, C. Payen-Champenois, and L. A. Skoglund
Intravenous Acetaminophen (Paracetamol): Comparable Analgesic Efficacy, but Better Local Safety than Its Prodrug, Propacetamol, for Postoperative Pain After Third Molar Surgery
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2005; 101(1): 90 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Beaussier, H. Weickmans, C. Paugam, S. Lavazais, J. P. Baechle, P. Goater, A. Buffin, J. F. Loriferne, J. F. Perier, J. P. Didelot, et al.
A Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison Between Parecoxib Sodium and Propacetamol for Parenteral Postoperative Analgesia After Inguinal Hernia Repair in Adult Patients
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2005; 100(5): 1309 - 1315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C. Remy, E. Marret, and F. Bonnet
Effects of acetaminophen on morphine side-effects and consumption after major surgery: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2005; 94(4): 505 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
G. Boccara, A. Chaumeron, Y. Pouzeratte, and C. Mann
The preoperative administration of ketoprofen improves analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in comparison with propacetamol or postoperative ketoprofen
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2005; 94(3): 347 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. Buvanendran, J. S. Kroin, K. J. Tuman, T. R. Lubenow, D. Elmofty, M. Moric, and A. G. Rosenberg
Effects of Perioperative Administration of a Selective Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitor on Pain Management and Recovery of Function After Knee Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA, November 12, 2003; 290(18): 2411 - 2418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. Lahtinen, H. Kokki, H. Hendolin, T. Hakala, and M. Hynynen
Propacetamol as Adjunctive Treatment for Postoperative Pain After Cardiac Surgery
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2002; 95(4): 813 - 819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. F. White
The Role of Non-Opioid Analgesic Techniques in the Management of Pain After Ambulatory Surgery
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2002; 94(3): 577 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Hyllested, S. Jones, J. L. Pedersen, and H. Kehlet
Comparative effect of paracetamol, NSAIDs or their combination in postoperative pain management: a qualitative review
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2002; 88(2): 199 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. Hernandez-Palazon, J. A. Tortosa, J. F. Martinez-Lage, and D. Perez-Flores
Intravenous Administration of Propacetamol Reduces Morphine Consumption After Spinal Fusion Surgery
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2001; 92(6): 1473 - 1476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. J. Zhou, J. Tang, and P. F. White
Propacetamol Versus Ketorolac for Treatment of Acute Postoperative Pain After Total Hip or Knee Replacement
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2001; 92(6): 1569 - 1575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. L. Shafer, G. Varrassi, and F. Marinangeli
The Importance of Dose-Response in Study Design • Response
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 1999; 89(3): 805 - 805.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 1999 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1999 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.