| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||

*Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and
Department of Pediatrics, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Politis, Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1009. Address e-mail to gpolitis{at}wfubmc.edu
We conducted a survey of Society for Pediatric Anesthesia anesthesiologists practicing within the United States to determine the frequency of tracheal intubation of healthy infants and children using an inhaled anesthetic without muscle relaxation (IAWMR). We also examined reasons for the use of this technique. Of all responders who listed their most often used technique for tracheal intubation of healthy infants and children, IAWMR was chosen over intubation with a muscle relaxant by 38.1% and 43.6%, respectively. Anesthesiologists who most often used IAWMR for tracheal intubation of healthy infants and children had over twice the odds (odds ratio [OR] 2.30 for infants, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.184.50; P = 0.015) of classifying their own practice as nonacademic, and one-third the odds (OR 0.34 for infants, 95% CI 0.170.68; P = 0.002) of conducting more than half of their cases in a supervisory role. Anesthesiologists who use IAWMR to tracheally intubate healthy pediatric patients most commonly selected as their reasons the lack of need for a muscle relaxant and the desire to avoid both succinylcholine and the excessive duration of nondepolarizing muscle relaxants.
Implications: Inhaled anesthetic without muscle relaxation is the most often used method of intubation for more than one third of Society for Pediatric Anesthesia anesthesiologists when tracheally intubating healthy, fasted pediatric patients undergoing elective procedures. The frequency of this practice seems to be highest in nonacademic practices.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. T. Verghese, R. S. Hannallah, M. Brennan, J. L. Yarvitz, K. A. Hummer, K. M. Patel, J. He, and R. McCarter The Effect of Intranasal Administration of Remifentanil on Intubating Conditions and Airway Response After Sevoflurane Induction of Anesthesia in Children Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2008; 107(4): 1176 - 1181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Aouad, S. S. Sayyid, M. I. Zalaket, and A. S. Baraka Intravenous Lidocaine as Adjuvant to Sevoflurane Anesthesia for Endotracheal Intubation in Children Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2003; 96(5): 1325 - 1327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Politis, M. J. Frankland, R. L. James, J. F. ReVille, M. P. Rieker, and B. C. Petree Factors Associated with Successful Tracheal Intubation of Children with Sevoflurane and No Muscle Relaxant Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2002; 95(3): 615 - 620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Abouleish, J. Berman, N. C. Nguyen, S. Otuwa, L. Woodson, J. Mayhew, and G. D. Politis Topical Lidocaine as Adjunct to Intubation Without Muscle Relaxant in Pediatric Patients • Response Anesth. Analg., November 1, 1999; 89(5): 1328 - 1328. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|