JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (24) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Knapp, S. Articles by Frass, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Knapp, S. Articles by Frass, M.

---

CRITICAL CARE AND TRAUMA

The Assessment of Four Different Methods to Verify Tracheal Tube Placement in the Critical Care Setting

Department of Internal Medicine I and Department of Medical Statistics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Sylvia Knapp, MD, Department of Internal Medicine I, Waehringer Guertel 18–20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. Address e-mail to sylvia.knapp{at}akh-wien.ac.at

One of the most serious complications of conventional endotracheal intubation is unidentified placement of the tube in the esophagus. The aim of our study was to evaluate four different methods for immediate detection of the tube position: auscultation, capnographic determination of ETCO₂, esophageal detection method (EDM) using a self-inflating bulb, and the transillumination method using a lighted stylet (Trachlight^TM; Laerdal, Armonk, NY). Thirty-eight endotracheally intubated patients admitted to our medical intensive care unit were enrolled in the study. A second identical tube was inserted into the esophagus under laryngoscopic control. The endotracheal tube was then disconnected from the ventilator. Two blinded examiners, one experienced, the other inexperienced, determined the tube position within 30 s using one of the four methods. The order of the tubes tested and the methods used were randomized. In 130 of 152 examinations, both examiners correctly diagnosed the position of the tube. The wrong result was obtained by both examiners 4 times; only the experienced examiner was wrong 4 times, and only the inexperienced examiner was wrong 14 times. Using ETCO₂, both examiners were correct in all cases. Auscultation showed an obvious relation to the examiner’s experience: the experienced examiner was correct in all cases, the inexperienced examiner was correct in only 68% of cases. Using the self-inflating bulb, there were two wrong results of the experienced examiner and one wrong result of the inexperienced examiner. The transillumination technique was associated with a high error rate by both examiners (16% and 13%, respectively). Comparing all four methods showed that capnography is superior to auscultation (P = 0.0005) and to the Trachlight^TM detection method (P = 0.0078). EDM was not statistically superior to auscultation and transillumination. Capnography was the most reliable method for rapid evaluation of tube position, followed by EDM, whereas auscultation and Trachlight^TM did not seem to be of comparable value. Experience was a determining factor for auscultation.

Implications: To prevent unidentified esophageal intubation, a serious complication in the critical care setting, four methods for detecting tube position were tested by two examiners (one experienced, the other inexperienced) in endotracheally intubated patients after insertion of a second tube into the esophagus.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Cinel, S. Jean, C. Tay, I. Gratz, E. Deal, J. E. Parrillo, and R. P. Dellinger Case Report: Vibration response imaging findings following inadvertent esophageal intubation: [Presentation de cas: Trouvailles en imagerie par reponse vibratoire a la suite d'une intubation oesophagienne involontaire] Can J Anesth, March 1, 2008; 55(3): 172 - 176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. J. Lin, K. T. Chen, N. P. Foo, C.-C. Hsu, and H. R. Guo Detection of oesophageal intubations using cuff pressures in a pig trachea oesophagus model Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2007; 99(5): 740 - 743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S Grmec and S Mally Prehospital determination of tracheal tube placement in severe head injury Emerg. Med. J., July 1, 2004; 21(4): 518 - 520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				End-Tidal CO2 Superior for Confirmation of Tracheal Tube Placement Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, June 1, 1999; 1999(601): 1 - 1. [Full Text]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999