JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, S.
Anesth Analg 1999;88:827
© 1999 International Anesthesia Research Society


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MANAGEMENT

The Effects of Three Graded Doses of Meperidine for Spinal Anesthesia in African Men

Diethelm Hansen, MD, and Stefanie Hansen, MD

Lilongwe Central Hospital, Lilongwe, Malawi, Africa

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. D. Hansen, Klinik für Anaesthesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, Klinikum Benjamin Franklin der FU Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200 Berlin, Germany.

The intrathecal injection of 0.7–1 mg/kg meperidine provides spinal anesthesia of only short duration. In this study, we investigated the effects of three different doses of meperidine for spinal anesthesia on the duration and level of sensory block and the incidence of side effects. Forty-five African men were randomly allocated to receive one of three doses of intrathecal meperidine: Group A = 1.2 mg/kg, Group B = 1.5 mg/kg, and Group C = 1.8 mg/kg. The duration of sensory block was significantly longer after 1.5 mg/kg compared with 1.2 mg/kg meperidine (112 ± 19 vs 79 ± 27 min; P = 0.001). Increasing the dose to 1.8 mg/kg did not further increase the duration of block. The level and the onset of the block were not affected by the dose. Common side effects were fatigue (27%), pruritus (20%), and nausea (7%). Seven patients had respiratory depression and seven had a decrease of systolic arterial blood pressure (SAP) >30% from baseline. There was no difference in the incidence of any side effect among groups. Respiratory depression and decreases in SAP were observed 5–50 min after meperidine injection. Twenty-two patients had no pain after the sensory block had terminated. We conclude that increasing the dose of meperidine from 1.2 to 1.5 mg/kg increased the duration, but not the level, of sensory block without an increase in side effects.

Implications: Intrathecal meperidine 1 mg/kg provides surgical anesthesia for only 40–90 min. We investigated the effects of three larger doses of meperidine in 45 African men. The 1.5 and 1.8 mg/kg doses provide a longer duration of anesthesia compared with 1.2 mg/kg. Nausea, pruritus, and respiratory depression were common in all dose groups. We conclude that increasing the dose of meperidine from 1.2 to 1.5 mg/kg increased the duration, but not the level, of sensory block without an increase in side effects.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. P. Rathmell, T. R. Lair, and B. Nauman
The Role of Intrathecal Drugs in the Treatment of Acute Pain
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2005; 101(5S_Suppl): S30 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J.-D. Roy, M. Girard, and P. Drolet
Intrathecal Meperidine Decreases Shivering During Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2004; 98(1): 230 - 234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1999 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.