| JOURNAL HOME | CME HOME | THIS MONTH | PAST ISSUES | ETOC | COLLECTIONS |
| AUTHORS | REVIEWERS | EDITORIAL BOARD | FEEDBACK | RSS | HELP |
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Eugene McDermott Center for Pain Management, Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Paul F. White, PhD, MD, FANZCA, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75235-9068. Address e-mail to pwhite{at}mednet.swmed.edu
Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common medical problems in our society. Increasingly, patients are turning to nonpharmacologic analgesic therapies such as percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS). We designed this sham-controlled study to compare the effect of three different frequencies of electrical stimulation on the analgesic response to PENS therapy. Sixty-eight consenting patients with LBP secondary to degenerative lumbar disc disease were treated with PENS therapy at 4 Hz, alternating 15 Hz and 30 Hz (15/30 Hz), and 100 Hz, as well as sham-PENS (0 Hz), according to a randomized, cross-over study design. Each treatment was administered for a period of 30 min three times per week for 2 wk. The pre- and posttreatment assessments included the health status survey short form and visual analog scales for pain, physical activity, and quality of sleep. After receiving all four treatments, patients completed a global assessment questionnaire. The sham-PENS treatments failed to produce changes in the degree of pain, physical activity, sleep quality, or daily intake of oral analgesic medications. In contrast, 4-Hz, 15/30-Hz, and 100-Hz stimulation all produced significant decreases in the severity of pain, increases in physical activity, improvements in the quality of sleep, and decreases in oral analgesic requirements (P < 0.01). Of the three frequencies, 15/30 Hz was the most effective in decreasing pain, increasing physical activity, and improving the quality of sleep (P < 0.05). In the global assessment, 40% of the patients reported that 15/30 Hz was the most desirable therapy, and it was also more effective in improving the patient’s sense of well-being. We conclude that the frequency of electrical stimulation is an important determinant of the analgesic response to PENS therapy. Alternating stimulation at 15-Hz and 30-Hz frequencies was more effective than either 4 Hz or 100 Hz in improving outcome measures in patients with LBP.
Implications: The frequency of electrical stimulation seems to be an important determinant of the analgesic efficacy of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Mixed low- and high-frequency stimulation was more effective than either low or high frequencies alone in the treatment of patients with low back pain.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S.-M. Wang, Z. N. Kain, and P. White Acupuncture Analgesia: I. The Scientific Basis Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2008; 106(2): 602 - 610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.-M. Wang, Z. N. Kain, and P. F. White Acupuncture Analgesia: II. Clinical Considerations Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2008; 106(2): 611 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. M. Sator-Katzenschlager, M. M. Wolfler, S. A. Kozek-Langenecker, K. Sator, P.-G. Sator, B. Li, G. Heinze, and M. O. Sator Auricular electro-acupuncture as an additional perioperative analgesic method during oocyte aspiration in IVF treatment Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2114 - 2120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Yokoyama, X. Sun, S. Oku, N. Taga, K. Sato, S. Mizobuchi, T. Takahashi, and K. Morita Comparison of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Long-Term Pain Relief in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2004; 98(6): 1552 - 1556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. F. White Electroanalgesia: Does It Have a Place in the Routine Management of Acute and Chronic Pain? Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2004; 98(5): 1197 - 1198. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Sator-Katzenschlager, G. Scharbert, S. A. Kozek-Langenecker, J. C. Szeles, G. Finster, A. W. Schiesser, G. Heinze, and H. G. Kress The Short- and Long-Term Benefit in Chronic Low Back Pain Through Adjuvant Electrical Versus Manual Auricular Acupuncture Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2004; 98(5): 1359 - 1364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Sator-Katzenschlager, J. C. Szeles, G. Scharbert, A. Michalek-Sauberer, A. Kober, G. Heinze, and S. A. Kozek-Langenecker Electrical Stimulation of Auricular Acupuncture Points Is More Effective Than Conventional Manual Auricular Acupuncture in Chronic Cervical Pain: A Pilot Study Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2003; 97(5): 1469 - 1473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. W. Herman Authors' response J Am Dent Assoc, October 1, 2002; 133(10): 1320 - 1321. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. M. Salerno, R. Browning, and J. L. Jackson The Effect of Antidepressant Treatment on Chronic Back Pain: A Meta-analysis Arch Intern Med, January 14, 2002; 162(1): 19 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. F. White, E.-s. A. Ghoname, H. E. Ahmed, M. A. Hamza, W. F. Craig, and A. S. Vakharia The Effect of Montage on the Analgesic Response to Percutaneous Neuromodulation Therapy Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2001; 92(2): 483 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. F. White, S. Li, and J. W. Chiu Electroanalgesia: Its Role in Acute and Chronic Pain Management Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2001; 92(2): 505 - 513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. C. Pinsker, P. F. White, and W. F. Craig Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation or Acupuncture • Response Anesth. Analg., October 1, 1999; 89(4): 1065 - 1065. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Berkman, M. H. Hyman, E. A. Kaplan, P. F. White, and W. F. Craig Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Treatment of Low Back Pain JAMA, September 8, 1999; 282(10): 941 - 942. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
