| JOURNAL HOME | CME HOME | THIS MONTH | PAST ISSUES | ETOC | COLLECTIONS |
| AUTHORS | REVIEWERS | EDITORIAL BOARD | FEEDBACK | RSS | HELP |
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Departments of Anaesthesia,
*St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne,
Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne,
Alfred Hospital, Melbourne;
§Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane,
||Westmead Hospital, Sydney,
¶Wellington Hospital, Wellington,
**Launceston General Hospital, Launceston,
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth,
King Edward Memorial Hospital for Women, Perth,
§§Auckland Hospital, Auckland,
||||Royal Perth Hospital, Perth,
¶¶Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand; and
***Astra Pain Control AB, Sweden
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. D. A. Scott, Department of Anaesthesia, St. Vincent’s Hospital, 41 Victoria Parade, Melbourne, Victoria 3064, Australia.
Our aim in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was to compare the analgesic effectiveness and side effects of epidural infusions with ropivacaine 2 mg/mL alone (Group R; n = 60) and in combination with fentanyl 1 µg/mL (R1F; n = 59), 2 µg/mL (R2F; n = 62), and 4 µg/mL (R4F; n = 63) for up to 72 h after major abdominal surgery. Effective epidural neural blockade was established before surgery; postoperatively, the infusion rate was titrated to a maximum of 14 mL/h for analgesia. No additional analgesics other than acetaminophen were permitted during the infusion. The median of individual visual analog scale score with coughing were <20 mm for all groups (0 = no pain, 100 = worst pain) and was significantly lower (P < 0.01) for Group R4F at rest and with coughing (compared with Group R). Infusions were discontinued due to inability to control pain in significantly fewer patients in Group R4F (16%) than the other groups (34% to 39%; P < 0.01). For all groups, >90% of patients had no detectable motor block after 24 h. Hypotension, nausea, and pruritus were more common with the larger dose of fentanyl. We conclude that, after major abdominal surgery, an epidural infusion of ropivacaine 2 mg/mL with fentanyl 4 µg/mL provided significantly more effective pain relief over a 3-day period than ropivacaine alone or ropivacaine with lower concentrations of fentanyl.
Implications: Postoperative epidural analgesic infusions are widely used, but there is little information regarding optimal strengths of opioid with local anesthetic. In this blinded, prospective study, we compared four different epidural infusion solutions for efficacy and side effects over a clinically useful postoperative period and conclude that an epidural infusion of ropivacaine 2 mg/mL with fentanyl 4 µg/mL was most effective.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  I. H. Lee and I. O. Lee The Antipruritic and Antiemetic Effects of Epidural Droperidol: A Study of Three Methods of Administration Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2007; 105(1): 251 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Niiyama, T. Kawamata, H. Shimizu, K. Omote, and A. Namiki The addition of epidural morphine to ropivacaine improves epidural analgesia after lower abdominal surgery: [L'addition de morphine peridurale a la ropivacaine ameliore l'analgesie peridurale apres une intervention chirurgicale abdominale basse] Can J Anesth, February 1, 2005; 52(2): 181 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. N. H. Tan, A. Guha, N. D. A. Scawn, S. H. Pennefather, and G. N. Russell Optimal concentration of epidural fentanyl in bupivacaine 0.1% after thoracotomy Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2004; 92(5): 670 - 674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Mitchell, T. Hucker, R. Venn, H. Wakeling, L. Forni, J. Sartain, K. Holte, N. E. Sharrock, and H. Kehlet Pathophysiology and clinical implications of perioperative fluid excess Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2003; 90(3): 395 - 396. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Macias, P. Monedero, M. Adame, W. Torre, I. Fidalgo, and F. Hidalgo A Randomized, Double-Blinded Comparison of Thoracic Epidural Ropivacaine, Ropivacaine/Fentanyl, or Bupivacaine/Fentanyl for Postthoracotomy Analgesia Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2002; 95(5): 1344 - 1350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Niemi and H. Breivik Epinephrine Markedly Improves Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Produced by a Small-Dose Infusion of Ropivacaine, Fentanyl, and Epinephrine After Major Thoracic or Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Crossover Study With and Without Epinephrine Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2002; 94(6): 1598 - 1605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Pouzeratte, J. M. Delay, G. Brunat, G. Boccara, C. Vergne, S. Jaber, J. M. Fabre, P. Colson, and C. Mann Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia After Abdominal Surgery: Ropivacaine Versus Bupivacaine Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2001; 93(6): 1587 - 1592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Jorgensen, J. S. Fomsgaard, J. Dirks, J. Wetterslev, B. Andreasson, and J. B. Dahl Effect of epidural bupivacaine vs combined epidural bupivacaine and morphine on gastrointestinal function and pain after major gynaecological surgery Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2001; 87(5): 727 - 732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. G. Wheatley, S. A. Schug, and D. Watson Safety and efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2001; 87(1): 47 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. S. Hodgson and S. S. Liu A Comparison of Ropivacaine with Fentanyl to Bupivacaine with Fentanyl for Postoperative Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2001; 92(4): 1024 - 1028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Brodner, N. Mertes, H. Van Aken, T. Mollhoff, M. Zahl, S. Wirtz, M. A. E. Marcus, and H. Buerkle What Concentration of Sufentanil Should be Combined with Ropivacaine 0.2% wt/vol for Postoperative Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia? Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2000; 90(3): 649 - 657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
