JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Imamachi, N.
Right arrow Articles by Kosaka, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Imamachi, N.
Right arrow Articles by Kosaka, Y.
Anesth Analg 1999;89:416
© 1999 International Anesthesia Research Society


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MANAGEMENT

The Non-NMDA Glutamate Receptor Antagonist CNQX Augments Lidocaine Antinociception Through a Spinal Action in Rats

Noritaka Imamachi, MD, Yoji Saito, MD, Kaoru Hara, MD, Shinichi Sakura, MD, and Yoshihiro Kosaka, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, Shimane Medical University, Izumo, Japan

Address correspondence to Y. Saito, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Shimane Medical University, 89-1 Enya-cho, Izumo, Shimane 693-8501, Japan. Address e-mail to ysaito{at}shimane -med.ac.jp.

Non-NMDA glutamate receptor antagonists produce antinociceptive effects, but the antinociceptive interaction between non-NMDA glutamate receptor antagonists and local anesthetics has not been demonstrated. We designed this study to evaluate the antinociceptive effects of a non-NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist and its interaction with lidocaine in rats. Intrathecal catheters were implanted at the L4-5 level in rats. The tail flick (TF) and colorectal distension (CD) tests were used to assess somatic and visceral antinociceptive effects, respectively. The TF latency and CD threshold were measured before and for 180 min after the intrathecal administration of lidocaine (20–100 µg), 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX) (0.4–4.0 µg), a combination of CNQX (0.2–0.6 µg) and lidocaine (10–30 µg), or isotonic sodium chloride solution. The TF latency and CD threshold were converted to the percent maximal possible effect (%MPE). To determine synergistic interaction, isobolographic analysis was used. Lidocaine or CNQX increased %MPEs in both the TF and CD tests. The coadministration of CNQX 0.4 µg and lidocaine 20 µg, which had no effect by alone, significantly increased %MPEs in the TF and CD tests for 30 min and 10 min, respectively. Isobolographic analysis revealed the synergistic antinociception of CNQX and lidocaine in the TF test. Motor impairment was not observed after that combination. We conclude that CNQX and lidocaine produce synergistic analgesia on somatic and visceral pain at the spinal level.

Implications: We investigated the antinociceptive effects of 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione and its interaction with lidocaine at the spinal level in rats. Intrathecal 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione produced both somatic and visceral antinociception, and its coadministration with lidocaine showed synergistic antinociceptive effects.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C.-C. Yeh, S.-W. Jao, B. K. Huh, C.-S. Wong, C.-P. Yang, W. D. White, and C.-T. Wu
Preincisional Dextromethorphan Combined with Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia and Analgesia Improves Postoperative Pain and Bowel Function in Patients Undergoing Colonic Surgery
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2005; 100(5): 1384 - 1389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C.-T. Wu, C. O Borel, M.-S. Lee, J.-C. Yu, H.-S. Liou, H.-D. Yi, and C.-P. Yang
The Interaction Effect of Perioperative Cotreatment with Dextromethorphan and Intravenous Lidocaine on Pain Relief and Recovery of Bowel Function After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2005; 100(2): 448 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. A. Weinbroum, B. Bender, A. Nirkin, S. Chazan, I. Meller, and Y. Kollender
Dextromethorphan-Associated Epidural Patient-Controlled Analgesia Provides Better Pain- and Analgesics-Sparing Effects than Dextromethorphan-Associated Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia After Bone-Malignancy Resection: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded Study
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2004; 98(3): 714 - 722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. A. Weinbroum
Dextromethorphan Reduces Immediate and Late Postoperative Analgesic Requirements and Improves Patients' Subjective Scorings After Epidural Lidocaine and General Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2002; 94(6): 1547 - 1552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1999 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.