JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pöyhiä, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kalso, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pöyhiä, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kalso, E.
Anesth Analg 1999;89:428
© 1999 International Anesthesia Research Society


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MANAGEMENT

Systemic Physostigmine Shows Antiallodynic Effects in Neuropathic Rats

R. Pöyhiä, MD, PhD*,{dagger}, M. Xu, MD{dagger},{ddagger}, V. K. Kontinen, MD, PhD{dagger},{ddagger}, S. Paananen, MD{dagger},{ddagger}, and E. Kalso, MD, PhD{dagger}

*Department of Anesthesia, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada; and Departments of {dagger}Anaesthesia and {ddagger}Pharmacology and Toxicology, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Reino Pöyhiä, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesia, McGill University, Royal Victoria Hospital, 687 Pine Ave. West, Room F9.12, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1A1. Address e-mail to mbd2{at}musica.mcgill.ca

The aim of this study was to examine the antiallodynic and antinociceptive effects of subcutaneously administered physostigmine (50, 100, 200 µg/kg), compared with morphine (2.5, 5, 10 mg/kg) and NaCl after spinal nerve ligation in rats. The following stimuli were used: acetone (cold allodynia), von Frey hairs (mechanical allodynia), and paw flick test (thermal nociception). Motility boxes were used to investigate the effects of the drugs on motor performance. Physostigmine attenuated both mechanical and cold allodynia dose-dependently but had no effect on the paw flick test. The effect was antagonized by atropine (muscarinic receptor antagonist) but not by mecamylamine (nicotinic receptor antagonist) or naloxone (opioid receptor antagonist). Morphine produced dose-dependent antiallodynic and antinociceptive effects. In the antiallodynic doses, morphine caused severe rigidity. Physostigmine 200 µg/kg impaired locomotor activity, but no rigidity was observed.

Implications: Physostigmine has different effects on allodynia and nociception, which suggests that different cholinergic (muscarinic) mechanisms may be involved in neuropathic and nociceptive pain.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 1999 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1999 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.