This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) En Espanol Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hernández-Borges, A. A. Articles by Ormazábal-Ramos, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hernández-Borges, A. A. Articles by Ormazábal-Ramos, C.

---

ECONOMICS AND HEALTH SYSTEMS RESEARCH

Assessing the Relative Quality of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Internet Mailing Lists

Angel A. Hernández-Borges, MD^*, Pablo Macías-Cervi, MD, M. Asunción Gaspar-Guardado, MD, M. Luisa Torres-Álvarez de Arcaya, MD, Ana Ruiz-Rabaza, MD, and Carlos Ormazábal-Ramos, MD^*

*Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Hospital Universitario de Canarias; and Primary Care Center of La Orotava, Research Unit, Hospital Nuestra Señora de La Candelaria, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Hernández-Borges, C/Valencia, 21, 3°, 38005 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife (Canary Islands), Spain. Address e-mail to borges{at}redkbs.com

We studied the relative quality of a subset of anesthesiology and critical care medicine Internet mailing lists regarding the publishing capacity of their members to compare them with the major journals and conferences regarding these specialties. Using systematic searches on MEDLINE and according to the Science Citation Index 1995, we investigated the impact factor of mailing list subscribers, of the first authors of the selected articles, and of the first authors of published abstracts from conferences. We studied six mailing lists, seven journals, and four conferences. Journals and conferences showed a higher percentage of published authors and higher average impact factor among their first authors than the mailing lists did per subscriber. However, when only the subset of publishing authors from the three media was considered, no significant differences were found. We conclude that qualified authors may be found among the subscribers of Internet medical mailing lists on anesthesiology and critical care medicine. These professional discussion groups could complement peer-reviewed publications and conferences in professional information exchange and continuing medical education.

Implications: Internet publishing is not governed by rules that assure certain basic quality standards. Methods for assessing these standards are needed. We compared discussion groups with medical journals and conferences on anesthesiology and critical care medicine by calculating the impact factor of their members and first authors, respectively. Our study shows that qualified authors may be found in all three media.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Morken, N. Bull, and B. E. Moen The activity on a Norwegian Occupational Health mailing list 1997-2006 Occup. Med., January 1, 2009; 59(1): 56 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Ruskin, J. Oysten, and A. A. Hernandez-Borges Quality of Medical Information on the Internet Response Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2000; 90(5): 1246 - 1246. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Tramer How Can We Cope with the Internet? Anesth. Analg., August 1, 1999; 89(2): 271 - 271. [Full Text] [PDF]