JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Taheri, S. Articles by Eger, E. I Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Taheri, S. Articles by Eger, E. I, II

---

GENERAL ARTICLES

A Demonstration of the Concentration and Second Gas Effects in Humans Anesthetized with Nitrous Oxide and Desflurane

Department of Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco, California

Address correspondence to Edmond I Eger II, MD, Department of Anesthesia, S-455, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0464. Address e-mail to edmond_eger{at}quickmail.ucsf.edu

In the present study, we explored both the existence of and the basis for the concentration and second gas effects. Groups of six normocapnic patients were given one of three gas mixtures via a nonrebreathing system: 65% nitrous oxide (N₂O) plus 4% desflurane; 5% N₂O plus 4% desflurane; or 65% N₂O plus 0.5% desflurane plus 2% xenon (Xe). End-tidal carbon dioxide (CO₂) was held constant by adjustments in ventilation. Confirming the existence of the concentration effect, the end-tidal (F_A) concentration of N₂O increased toward the inspired (F_I) concentration more rapidly (i.e., F_A/F_I increased more rapidly) when the inspired concentration was 65% than when it was 5%. The F_A/F_I for desflurane also increased more rapidly when desflurane was given with 65% rather than 5% N₂O, confirming the existence of the second gas effect. The small uptake of the second gas (desflurane) did not influence its own F_A/F_I or that of N₂O; that is, the administration of 4%, rather than 0.5%, desflurane did not increase the rate of rise of F_A/F_I of either N₂O or desflurane. One of the bases of the concentration and second gas effects, a concentrating of residual gases, was confirmed: administration of Xe with 65% N₂O produced an F_A/F_I for Xe that exceeded 1.0. Patient sex did not seem to influence the rate of rise of F_A/F_I of either N₂O or desflurane. Finally, we unexpectedly found that, despite an equal solubility in blood, the rise in F_A/F_I for N₂O exceeded that for desflurane, perhaps because of differences in tissue solubilities and intertissue diffusion.

Implications: As predicted by the concentration and second gas effects, increasing the inspired concentration of nitrous oxide accelerated its rate of rise and the rate of rise of concurrently administered desflurane in humans.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. F. A. Hendrickx, R. Carette, H. J. M. Lemmens, and A. M. De Wolf Large volume N2O uptake alone does not explain the second gas effect of N2O on sevoflurane during constant inspired ventilation Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2006; 96(3): 391 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. J. Goldman Anesthetic Uptake of Sevoflurane and Nitrous Oxide During an Inhaled Induction in Children Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2003; 96(2): 400 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Uda, M. Onaka, T. Okuno, H. Mori, X.-G. Sun, and C. Lee The Second Gas Effect is Not Statistically Valid * Response Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2002; 94(3): 765 - 766. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K.-i. Nishikawa, F. Kunimoto, Y. Isa, S. Miyoshi, K.-i. Takahashi, T. Morita, H. Arii, and F. Goto Second gas effect of N2O on oxygen uptake Can J Anesth, June 1, 2000; 47(6): 506 - 510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999