JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow En Espanol
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chan, V. W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Perlas, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chan, V. W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Perlas, A.
Anesth Analg 1999;89:1006
© 1999 International Anesthesia Research Society


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MANAGEMENT

The Impact of Saline Flush of the Epidural Catheter on Resolution of Epidural Anesthesia in Volunteers: A Dose-Response Study

Vincent W. S. Chan, MD, Soheyla Nazarnia, MD, Zsuzsanna Kaszas, MD, and Anahi Perlas, MD

Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, The Toronto Hospital, Western Division, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Vincent Chan, Department of Anesthesia, The Toronto Hospital, Western Division, 339 Bathurst St., Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada.

We evaluated the effect of 1, 20, and 40 mL of epidural saline flush on recovery from lidocaine epidural anesthesia. Eight volunteers were studied for three study periods, each separated by 72 h. The volume of saline was randomized, and a new catheter was inserted for each study period. A standardized dose of 20 mL of 2% plain lidocaine was injected for 10 min, followed by an epidural saline flush 30 min later. Sensory block was assessed by pinprick and transcutaneous electrical stimulation and motor block by a modified Bromage scale and isometric maximal force contraction. Times to void and ambulate independently before discharge were recorded. Peak plasma lidocaine concentrations and time to peak concentration were determined. Results from six volunteers showed that epidural saline, 40 mL, significantly altered anesthetic resolution, accelerating the time of complete sensory and motor block regression (P < 0.05). Median peak levels of sensory and motor block and times to void and ambulate were similar among treatment groups. Peak plasma lidocaine concentrations were similar in all treatment groups. Our data suggest that a 40-mL epidural saline injection 30 min after the induction facilitates regression of epidural lidocaine anesthesia, but a 20-mL bolus does not. Epidural saline injection does not affect vascular absorption of epidural lidocaine.

Implications: Epidural catheter flushing with 40 mL of saline, after establishment of epidural lidocaine anesthesia, can facilitate sensory and motor block recovery. However, this does not affect vascular absorption of epidural lidocaine.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Kanai and S. Hoka
A comparison of epidural blockade produced by plain 1% lidocaine and 1% lidocaine prepared by dilution of 2% lidocaine with the same volume of saline.
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2006; 102(6): 1851 - 1855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 1999 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1999 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.