JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rudolph, H.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rudolph, H.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, B.
Anesth Analg 1999;89:1226
© 1999 International Anesthesia Research Society

REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MANAGEMENT

Smart Technology Improves Patient-Controlled Analgesia: A Preliminary Report

Heiko Rudolph, BA, B Eng (Hon), PhD*, John F. Cade, MD, PhD, FRACP, FANZCA, FCCP{dagger}, Peter T. Morley, MB, FRACP, FANZCA{dagger}, John S. Packer, ME, FIEAust*, and Brian Lee, Dip Anaes Sci, Cert Elec{dagger}

*Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Melbourne; and {dagger}Intensive Care Unit, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Prof. John F. Cade, Intensive Care Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria 3050, Australia.

A new adaptive system has been designed to improve patient-controlled analgesia through the use of a variable bolus dose and a variable background infusion of analgesic. A novel hand set allows patients to rate their own pain on a linear scale of 1 to 10. Data derived from the hand set signals are used by an expert algorithm to repeatedly adapt the drug dosage of the bolus and of the background infusion according to both current pain intensity and the patient’s response to previous dosage. To test the system, we performed a small pilot clinical study, using a randomized, double-blinded, cross-over design. The new system was alternated with a conventional system every 12 h. Use of the new system was associated with significantly lower pain scores and fewer bolus requests but more analgesic administration, though without increased adverse effects. It was very well accepted by both patients and clinical staff.

Implications: Pain relief after surgery is often best provided by patient-controlled analgesia, which uses an IV infusion pump and a patient-activated switch. We have developed a new computer-controlled or "smart" patient-controlled analgesia that rapidly learns a patient’s individual needs and provides continuously tailored pain relief.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
P. E. Macintyre
Safety and efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2001; 87(1): 36 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1999 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.