JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Meissner, A. Articles by Rolf, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Meissner, A. Articles by Rolf, N.

---

CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIA

Limited Upper Thoracic Epidural Block and Splanchnic Perfusion in Dogs

Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, Germany

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Professor Dr. med. H. Van Aken, Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Str. 33, D-48149 Münster, Germany.

Epidural blockade leads to a sympathetic block in affected segments and an increase of sympathetic outflow from various unblocked segments. A limited upper thoracic epidural block (LUTEB) is used during coronary artery surgery affecting the cardiac sympathetic fibers cephalad to the fifth thoracic segment. This block does not extend to the sympathetic fibers innervating the gastrointestinal organs. A LUTEB may lead to an increase of sympathetic activity in the unaffected splanchnic sympathetic segments and the decrease in splanchnic blood flow may contribute to gastrointestinal ischemia after cardiac surgery. We tested the hypothesis that a LUTEB decreases splanchnic perfusion in anesthetized dogs. Thirteen dogs were chronically instrumented with aortic and left atrial catheters, which were used for pressure measurement, as well as injection and withdrawal of reference samples. Thoracic epidural catheters were placed under general anesthesia the day before the experiment. Splanchnic blood flow was determined by using colored microspheres. Induction of a LUTEB did not change general hemodynamics in awake dogs. Propofol anesthesia induced an increase in heart rate that was abolished after LUTEB. LUTEB also decreased mean arterial pressure during propofol anesthesia. We conclude that thoracic epidural anesthesia had no effect on splanchnic blood flow. In propofol anesthetized animals, liver blood flow was increased compared with awake animals; however, it did not change after induction of LUTEB.

Implications: A sympathetic block in certain segments leads to increased sympathetic output in unblocked segments. For an upper thoracic epidural block, this might lead to impaired splanchnic perfusion. In awake and propofol-anesthetized, chronically instrumented dogs, however, a limited upper thoracic epidural blockade had no compromising effect on gastrointestinal perfusion.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. A. Vagts, T. Iber, M. Puccini, B. Szabo, J. Haberstroh, F. Villinger, K. Geiger, and G. F. E. Noldge-Schomburg The Effects of Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia on Hepatic Perfusion and Oxygenation in Healthy Pigs During General Anesthesia and Surgical Stress Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2003; 97(6): 1824 - 1832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. H. Gould, K. Grace, G. Thorne, and M. Thomas Effect of thoracic epidural anaesthesia on colonic blood flow Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2002; 89(3): 446 - 451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999