Anesth Analg 1999;89:1411
© 1999 International Anesthesia Research Society
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA
The Hemodynamic Effects of Propofol in Children with Congenital Heart Disease
Glyn D. Williams, FFA(SA)*,
Thomas K. Jones, MD ,
Kimberly A. Hanson, MD, PhD*, and
Jeffrey P. Morray, MD*
Departments of
*Anesthesiology and
Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine and Childrens Hospital and Regional Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
Address correspondence to Glyn D. Williams, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Childrens Hospital and Medical Center, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, P.O. Box C5371, Seattle, WA 98105.
We studied the hemodynamic effects of propofol during elective cardiac catheterization in 30 children with congenital heart disease. Sixteen patients were without cardiac shunt (Group I), six had left-to-right cardiac shunt (Group II), and eight had right-to-left cardiac shunt (Group III). The mean (±SD) ages were 3.8 ± 3.1 yr (Group I), 3.2 ± 3.7 yr (Group II), and 1.0 ± 0.6 yr (Group III). After sedation and cardiac catheter insertion, hemodynamic data and oxygen consumption were measured before and after the administration of propofol (2-mg/kg bolus, 50- to 200-µg · kg-1 · min-1 infusion), and values were compared by using a paired t-test (significance: P < 0.05). After the propofol administration, systemic mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance decreased significantly and systemic blood flow increased significantly in all patient groups; heart rate, pulmonary mean arterial pressure, and pulmonary vascular resistance were unchanged. Pulmonary to systemic resistance ratio increased (Group I, P = 0.005; Group II, P = 0.03; Group III, P = 0.10). In patients with cardiac shunt, propofol resulted in decreased left-to-right flow and increased right-to-left flow; the pulmonary to systemic flow ratio decreased significantly (Group II, P = 0.005; Group III, P = 0.01). Clinically relevant decreases in PaO2 (P = 0.008) and SaO2 (P = 0.01) occurred in Group III patients. We conclude that propofol can result in clinically important changes in cardiac shunt direction and flow.
Implications: The principal hemodynamic effect of propofol in children with congenital heart defects is a decrease in systemic vascular resistance. In children with cardiac shunt, this results in a decrease in the ratio of pulmonary to systemic blood flow, and it can lead to arterial desaturation in patients with cyanotic heart disease.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Papoff, M. Mancuso, E. Caresta, and C. Moretti
Effectiveness and Safety of Propofol in Newborn Infants
Pediatrics,
February 1, 2008;
121(2):
448 - 448.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. D. Williams, B. M. Philip, L. F. Chu, M. G. Boltz, K. Kamra, H. Terwey, G. B. Hammer, S. B. Perry, J. A. Feinstein, and C. Ramamoorthy
Ketamine Does Not Increase Pulmonary Vascular Resistance in Children with Pulmonary Hypertension Undergoing Sevoflurane Anesthesia and Spontaneous Ventilation
Anesth. Analg.,
December 1, 2007;
105(6):
1578 - 1584.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Carmosino, R. H. Friesen, A. Doran, and D. D. Ivy
Perioperative Complications in Children with Pulmonary Hypertension Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery or Cardiac Catheterization
Anesth. Analg.,
March 1, 2007;
104(3):
521 - 527.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M. Bailey, E. A. Gottlieb, J. L. Edmonds Jr, and W. C. Miller-Hance
Anesthetic Management of a Young Adult with Complex Congenital Heart Disease and Bronchopleural Fistula for Rigid Bronchoscopy
Anesth. Analg.,
December 1, 2006;
103(6):
1432 - 1435.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Goyal, U. Kiran, S. Chauhan, R. Juneja, and M. Choudhary
Efficacy of nitroglycerin inhalation in reducing pulmonary arterial hypertension in children with congenital heart disease
Br. J. Anaesth.,
August 1, 2006;
97(2):
208 - 214.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Yumul, A. Emdadi, and N. Moradi
Anesthesia for Noncardiac Surgery in Children with Congenital Heart Disease
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia,
June 1, 2003;
7(2):
153 - 165.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. N Hofer, M. W McCarthy, M. L Buck, and A. E Hendrick
Possible Anaphylaxis after Propofol in a Child with Food Allergy
Ann. Pharmacother.,
March 1, 2003;
37(3):
398 - 401.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. N. Cornfield, K. Tegtmeyer, M. D. Nelson, C. E. Milla, and M. Sweeney
Continuous Propofol Infusion in 142 Critically Ill Children
Pediatrics,
December 1, 2002;
110(6):
1177 - 1181.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|