JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kopacz, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, H. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kopacz, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, H. W.
Anesth Analg 1999;89:1497
© 1999 International Anesthesia Research Society


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MANAGEMENT

A Comparison of Levobupivacaine 0.125%, Fentanyl 4 µg/mL, or Their Combination for Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia After Major Orthopedic Surgery

Dan J. Kopacz, MD*, Nigel E. Sharrock, MB, ChB{dagger}, and Hugh W. Allen, MD*

Departments of Anesthesiology, *Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington; and {dagger}The Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York

Address correspondence to Dan J. Kopacz, MD, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, 1100 Ninth Ave., Mailstop B2-AN, Seattle, WA 98111. Address e-mail to anedjk{at}vmmc.org

Levobupivacaine, the isolated S(-) isomer of bupivacaine, is less cardiotoxic than racemic bupivacaine in animal studies. We studied the effectiveness of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with either levobupivacaine 0.125% or fentanyl 4 µg/mL alone, or a combination of levobupivacaine and fentanyl in 65 patients after total joint arthroplasty in a prospective, random, double-blinded fashion. Intraoperatively, all patients received 20 mL of 0.75% levobupivacaine. Study medication was infused at an initial rate of 4 mL/h, with additional medication available on patient demand (2 mL/10 min). The combination of levobupivacaine and fentanyl produced better analgesia (longer time to first PCEA request; P = 0.007 combination versus fentanyl and P = 0.006 combination versus levobupivacaine) than either drug alone. Patients in the levobupivacaine groups had appreciable sensory blockade to pinprick with minimal motor impairment. Resting and dynamic visual analog scale pain scores were lower in the combination group than in the plain fentanyl group at 6 (P = 0.022 and 0.036) and 12 h (P = 0.002 and 0.001). The 24-h overall patient- and investigator-rated visual analog scale pain scores were also lower in the combination group (resting P = 0.007, dynamic P = 0.005). There was no significant difference among the groups in the incidence of postoperative nausea (26.2%), pruritus (9.2%), hypotension (23.1%), or sedation (0%). We conclude that the analgesic effects of levobupivacaine 0.125% and fentanyl (4 µg/mL) are additive and beneficial for the management of orthopedic surgical pain by the PCEA method. Patients in this study began demand-dosing later, reported lower pain scores, and had no greater risk of adverse events than those who were given either levobupivacaine or fentanyl alone.

Implications: We demonstrated a significant additive effect of the combination of levobupivacaine (0.125%) and fentanyl (4 µg/mL), compared with either drug alone, when using patient-controlled epidural analgesia in patients after total joint arthroplasty.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Senard, A. Kaba, M. J. Jacquemin, L. M. Maquoi, M.-P. N. Geortay, P. D. Honore, M. L. Lamy, and J. L. Joris
Epidural Levobupivacaine 0.1% or Ropivacaine 0.1% Combined with Morphine Provides Comparable Analgesia After Abdominal Surgery
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2004; 98(2): 389 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
B. M. Block, S. S. Liu, A. J. Rowlingson, A. R. Cowan, J. A. Cowan Jr, and C. L. Wu
Efficacy of Postoperative Epidural Analgesia: A Meta-analysis
JAMA, November 12, 2003; 290(18): 2455 - 2463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. M. Walker, L. C. Goudas, M. J. Cousins, and D. B. Carr
Combination Spinal Analgesic Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2002; 95(3): 674 - 715.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
R. G. Wheatley, S. A. Schug, and D. Watson
Safety and efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2001; 87(1): 47 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1999 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.