JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crews, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Schatzman, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crews, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Schatzman, C.
Anesth Analg 1999;89:1504
© 1999 International Anesthesia Research Society


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MANAGEMENT

A Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of 0.25% Levobupivacaine Combined with 0.005% Morphine, 0.25% Levobupivacaine Alone, or 0.005% Morphine Alone for the Management of Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery

James C. Crews, MD*, Allen H. Hord, MD{dagger}, Donald D. Denson, PhD{dagger}, and Carmen Schatzman, MSN{ddagger}

*Pain Control Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; {dagger}Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; and {ddagger}Department of Anesthesia, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio

Address correspondence and reprint requests to James C. Crews, MD, Director, Acute Pain Service, Pain Control Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1009. Address e-mail to jcrews{at}wfubmc.edu

We compared the relative efficacy of the combination of the single-isomer local anesthetic levobupivacaine and the opioid analgesic morphine versus both drugs alone for postoperative epidural analgesia after major abdominal surgical procedures. Thoracic epidural anesthesia was produced and maintained with levobupivacaine 0.75% in combination with general inhaled anesthesia without opioids. Patients were randomized to one of three postoperative treatment groups: 1) a combination of levobupivacaine 0.25% and morphine 0.005%; 2) levobupivacaine 0.25%; or 3) morphine 0.005%. Postoperatively, all epidural infusions were commenced at a rate of 4 mL/h. Patients could receive a 4 mL-bolus dose and an increase in the epidural infusion rate by 2 mL/h on request for supplemental analgesia. Patients were also allowed ketorolac as a supplemental analgesic at any time after the first analgesic request. Patients in the combination group had longer times to request for supplemental analgesia as compared with the levobupivacaine only group (P < 0.05) and a trend toward longer time to request as compared with the morphine only group (P = 0.066). Patients in the combination group had lower visual analog scale pain scores at rest and activity at 4 and 8 h and fewer requests for supplemental ketorolac (P < 0.05). In conclusion, this study demonstrates a significant improvement in postoperative analgesic efficacy with the combination of levobupivacaine and morphine for continuous epidural analgesia after major abdominal surgical procedures.

Implications: A significant improvement in postoperative analgesic efficacy is demonstrated with the thoracic epidural administration of the combination of the single-isomer local anesthetic levobupivacaine 0.25% and morphine 0.005% in patients after major abdominal surgical procedures as compared with either drug used alone.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Senard, A. Kaba, M. J. Jacquemin, L. M. Maquoi, M.-P. N. Geortay, P. D. Honore, M. L. Lamy, and J. L. Joris
Epidural Levobupivacaine 0.1% or Ropivacaine 0.1% Combined with Morphine Provides Comparable Analgesia After Abdominal Surgery
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2004; 98(2): 389 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
L. C. Goudas, D. B. Carr, S. M. Walker, and M. J. Cousins
Combination Spinal Analgesic Chemotherapy: An Additional Clinical Trial of Opioid Plus Local Anesthetic
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2003; 96(6): 1841 - 1841.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
A. R. Gammaitoni, B. S. Galer, S. Bulloch, P. Lacouture, F. Caruso, T. Ma, and T. Schlagheck
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Oxycodone 10 mg/Acetaminophen 325 mg versus Controlled-Release Oxycodone 20 mg in Postsurgical Pain
J. Clin. Pharmacol., March 1, 2003; 43(3): 296 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Senard, J. L. Joris, D. Ledoux, P. J. Toussaint, B. Lahaye-Goffart, and M. L. Lamy
A Comparison of 0.1% and 0.2% Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine Combined with Morphine for Postoperative Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia After Major Abdominal Surgery
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2002; 95(2): 444 - 449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
R. G. Wheatley, S. A. Schug, and D. Watson
Safety and efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2001; 87(1): 47 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1999 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.