JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fujii, Y. Articles by Toyooka, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fujii, Y. Articles by Toyooka, H.

---

GENERAL ARTICLES

Propofol Decreases Diaphragmatic Contractility in Dogs

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Tsukuba Institute of Clinical Medicine, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki, Japan

Address correspondence and reprint requests Yoshitaka Fujii, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Tsukuba Institute of Clinical Medicine, 2-1-1, Amakubo, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki 305, Japan.

Volatile anesthetics depress diaphragmatic muscle function; however, no data are available regarding the effect of propofol on diaphragmatic contractility. We therefore studied this effect in dogs. Pentobarbital-anesthetized animals were divided into three groups of 10 each. Group I received only maintenance fluid; Group II was infused with a subhypnotic dose of propofol (0.1-mg/kg initial dose plus 1.5-mg · kg^-1 · h^-1 maintenance dose); Group III was infused with an anesthetic dose of propofol (0.1-mg/kg initial dose plus 6.0-mg · kg^-1 · h^-1 maintenance dose). We assessed diaphragmatic contractility by transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi). With an infusion of propofol in Groups II and III, Pdi at low-frequency (20-Hz) stimulation decreased from the baseline values (P < 0.05), whereas Pdi at high-frequency (100-Hz) stimulation did not change. Compared with Group I, Pdi at 20-Hz stimulation decreased during propofol administration in Groups II and III (P < 0.05). The decrease in Pdi was more in Group III than in Group II (P < 0.05). We conclude that propofol is associated with a dose-related inhibitory effect on diaphragmatic contractility in dogs.

Implications: Propofol is an effective IV anesthetic for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia. Subhypnotic and anesthetic doses of propofol decrease diaphragmatic contractility in dogs.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. M. Hemmerling, N. Le, P. Decarie, J. Cousineau, and D. Bracco Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol augments the potency of mivacurium: [L'anesthesie intraveineuse totale avec le propofol augmente la puissance du mivacurium] Can J Anesth, June 1, 2008; 55(6): 351 - 357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Fujii, A. Uemura, and H. Toyooka The Recovery Profile of Reduced Diaphragmatic Contractility Induced by Propofol in Dogs Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2004; 99(1): 113 - 116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. H. Dueck, A. Oberthuer, C. Wedekind, M. Paul, and U. Boerner Propofol Impairs the Central but Not the Peripheral Part of the Motor System Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2003; 96(2): 449 - 455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Fujii, A. Uemura, and H. Toyooka The Dose-Range Effects of Propofol on the Contractility of Fatigued Diaphragm in Dogs Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2001; 93(5): 1194 - 1198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Fujii and H. Toyooka Midazolam versus propofol for reducing contractility of fatigued canine diaphragm Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2001; 86(6): 879 - 881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Haeseler, M. Stormer, J. Bufler, R. Dengler, H. Hecker, S. Piepenbrock, and M. Leuwer Propofol Blocks Human Skeletal Muscle Sodium Channels in a Voltage-Dependent Manner Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2001; 92(5): 1192 - 1198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Fujii, T. Hoshi, S. Takahashi, and H. Toyooka The Effect of Sedative Drugs on Diaphragmatic Contractility in Dogs: Propofol Versus Midazolam Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2000; 91(4): 1035 - 1037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999