JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kanai, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Takasaki, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kanai, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Takasaki, M.
Anesth Analg 2000;90:415
© 2000 International Anesthesia Research Society


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MANAGEMENT

Comparisons of the Anesthetic Potency and Intracellular Concentrations of S(-) and R() Bupivacaine and Ropivacaine in Crayfish Giant Axon in Vitro

Yuko Kanai, MD, Hiroshi Katsuki, MD, PhD, and Mayumi Takasaki, MD, PhD

Department of Anesthesiology, Miyazaki Medical College, Miyazaki, Japan

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Yuko Kanai, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Miyazaki Medical College, 5200 Kihara, Kiyotake, Miyazaki 889-1692, Japan. Address e-mail to yukanai{at}post1.miyazaki-med.ac.jp

Levobupivacaine and ropivacaine are both single S(-) enantiomers that have less severe cardiotoxic and convulsant effects than racemic bupivacaine. We compared the anesthetic actions of S(-) bupivacaine, R(+) bupivacaine, and ropivacaine in vitro by studying their effects on action potential amplitude and the maximal rate of rise of action potential in crayfish giant axon. To clarify the difference of intracellular anesthetic concentration, the intracellular ionized anesthetic concentration was measured. Desheathed crayfish axons were stimulated at a frequency of either 0.1 or 5 Hz and perfused with 1 mM of each anesthetic at pH 7.0. Intracellular anesthetic concentration was measured by us- ing local anesthetic-sensitive glass microelectrodes. At 0.1-Hz stimulation, no differences were observed in their potency. At 5-Hz stimulation, the order of magnitude of the mean percentage decrease in maximal rate of rise of action potential was S(-) bupivacaine > R(+) bupivacaine > ropi-vacaine. Intracellular local anesthetic concentration did not differ among the three anesthetics at 0.1 Hz and 5 Hz. We conclude that, compared with ropivacaine, S(-) bupivacaine has a more potent phasic blocking effect in crayfish giant axon. The intracellular local anesthetic concentrations of S(-), R(+) bupivacaine and ropivacaine were not significantly different, regardless of differences in blocking effect and stimulation frequency.

Implications: S(-) bupivacaine has a more potent phasic blocking effect than ropivacaine or R(+) bupivacaine in crayfish giant axons in vitro. An equivalent intracellular local anesthetic concentration for the three anesthetics was found, suggesting that the intracellular cationic local anesthetic concentration is not directly correlated with the intensity of block.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. Yano, S. Ibusuki, and M. Takasaki
A comparison of intracellular lidocaine and bupivacaine concentrations producing nerve conduction block in the giant axon of crayfish in vitro.
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2006; 102(6): 1734 - 1738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.