JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) En Espanol Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bourke, M. Articles by McCarroll, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bourke, M. Articles by McCarroll, M.

---

REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MANAGEMENT

A Comparison of Regularly Administered Sustained Release Oral Morphine with Intramuscular Morphine for Control of Postoperative Pain

Department of Anesthesia, Cappagh Orthopaedic Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. M. McCarroll, Department of Anesthesia, Cappagh Orthopaedic Hospital, Dublin 11, Ireland.

We studied the efficacy and side effect profile of regularly administered, oral sustained-release morphine sulfate tablets (MST) and IM morphine in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty under lumbar spinal anesthesia. Patients in Group I received MST 20 mg 12 hourly and a placebo IM injection 6 hourly regularly. Group II patients received an oral placebo 12 hourly and morphine sulfate 10 mg IM 6 hourly regularly. Rescue analgesia was provided with regular diclofenac suppositories and patient-controlled analgesia. Pain scores assessed by using visual analog scale and verbal pain scoring at rest and with movement were low in both groups, with no statistical difference between groups. Mean patient-controlled analgesia morphine consumption during the 48-h study was 16.7 mg in the IM group and 25.9 mg in the MST group. The difference between the groups was significant at 36 h postoperatively (0.03). Side effects of sedation and respiratory depression were not problematic in either group, with a maximal sedation score of 2 occurring once in a patient in Group II. Nausea and vomiting occurred more often in Group II, but this was not statistically significant, with a mean nausea/vomiting score for Group II of 1.7. We conclude that oral, sustained-release morphine is an attractive alternative to IM opiates in patients undergoing body surface surgery under regional anesthesia.

Implications: Each postoperative analgesic has its own limitations for route of administration, dosage, and potential side effects. Using the oral route for drug administration seems more attractive than other methods but may not be suitable in all postoperative patients. We studied the efficacy and side effect profile of sustained-release, oral morphine compared with standard IM morphine for the treatment of pain after hip replacement surgery. We concluded that use of the oral preparation is a suitable alternative to the IM route in this population undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Blumenthal, K. Min, M. Marquardt, and A. Borgeat Postoperative Intravenous Morphine Consumption, Pain Scores, and Side Effects with Perioperative Oral Controlled-Release Oxycodone After Lumbar Discectomy Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2007; 105(1): 233 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Strassels, E. McNicol, and R. Suleman Postoperative pain management: A practical review, part 1 Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., September 15, 2005; 62(18): 1904 - 1916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Pearl, D. L. McCauley, J. Thompson, L. Mahler, F. A. Valea, and E. Chalas A Randomized Controlled Trial of Early Oral Analgesia in Gynecologic Oncology Patients Undergoing Intra-Abdominal Surgery Obstet. Gynecol., May 1, 2002; 99(5): 704 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999