This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Glance, L. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Glance, L. G.

---

ECONOMICS AND HEALTH SYSTEMS RESEARCH

The Cost Effectiveness of Anesthesia Workforce Models: A Simulation Approach Using Decision-Analysis Modeling

University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Laurent G. Glance, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave., Box 604, Rochester, NY 14642.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the incremental cost effectiveness of anesthesia workforce staffing scenarios, as a function of skill mix, by using the technique of decision analysis. A decision tree model was constructed to compare the incremental cost effectiveness of alternative delivery systems for anesthesia care from the perspective of the payer. Five different staffing scenarios, ranging from physician-intensive to nurse-intensive, were modeled. In the nurse-intensive model, low- and intermediate-risk patients were cared for by solo certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) and high-risk patients were cared for by physicians. In the physician-intensive model, physicians anesthetized all patients. In the first-, second-, and third-team models, all high-risk patients were cared for by physicians working alone, and all intermediate-risk patients were cared for using an anesthesia care team approach with a ratio of one physician to two CRNAs. The low-risk patients were managed by using an anesthesia care team approach with physician to CRNA ratios of 1:2, 1:4, and 1:8 in the first-, second-, and third-team models, respectively. The findings of this decision-analysis model suggest that physician-only anesthesia is not cost effective. However, the third-team model is cost effective when compared with the nurse-intensive model.

Implications: An anesthesia care-team approach with a physician to certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA) ratio of 1:2 is the preferred staffing scenario for intermediate-risk patients. Although medical direction of CRNAs caring for low-risk patients is cost-effective, the small improvement in outcome resulting from increasing the physician to CRNA ratio from 1:8 to 1:4 may not be justified by the added cost.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. P. Abenstein, K. H. Long, B. P. McGlinch, and N. M. Dietz Is Physician Anesthesia Cost-Effective? Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2004; 98(3): 750 - 757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Martin-Sheridan The Cost Effectiveness of Anesthesia Workforce Models: A Critique Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2000; 91(5): 1312 - 1312. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Biddle and L. Glance The Cost Effectiveness of Anesthesia Workforce Models: The Creation of a Procrustean Bed Response Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2000; 91(5): 1313 - 1313. [Full Text] [PDF]