JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow En Espanol
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (46)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meister, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gaver, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meister, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gaver, R.
Anesth Analg 2000;90:632-637
© 2000 International Anesthesia Research Society


OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA

A Comparison of Epidural Analgesia with 0.125% Ropivacaine with Fentanyl Versus 0.125% Bupivacaine with Fentanyl during Labor

Greg C. Meister, MD, Robert D’Angelo, MD, Medge Owen, MD, Kenneth E. Nelson, MD, and Renee Gaver, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Robert D’Angelo, MD, Obstetric Anesthesia, Forsyth Medical Center, 3333 Silas Creek Pkwy., Winston-Salem, NC 27103. Address e-mail to rdangelo{at}wfubmc.edu

We previously found that the extent of an epidural motor block produced by 0.125% ropivacaine was clinically indistinguishable from 0.125% bupivacaine in laboring patients. By adding fentanyl to the 0.125% ropivacaine and bupivacaine solutions in an attempt to reduce hourly local anesthetic requirements, we hypothesized that differences in motor block produced by the two drugs may become apparent. Fifty laboring women were randomized to receive either 0.125% ropivacaine with fentanyl 2 µg/mL or an equivalent concentration of bupivacaine/fentanyl using patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with settings of: 6-mL/hr basal rate, 5-mL bolus, 10-min lockout, 30-mL/h dose limit. Analgesia, local anesthetic use, motor block, patient satisfaction, and side effects were assessed until the time of delivery. No differences in verbal pain scores, local anesthetic use, patient satisfaction, or side effects between groups were observed; however, patients administered ropivacaine/fentanyl developed significantly less motor block than patients administered bupivacaine/fentanyl. Ropivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 2 µg/mL produces similar labor analgesia with significantly less motor block than an equivalent concentration of bupivacaine/fentanyl. Whether this statistical reduction in motor block improves clinical outcome or is applicable to anesthesia practices which do not use the PCEA technique remains to be determined.

Implications: By using a patient-controlled epidural analgesia technique, ropivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 2 µg/mL produces similar analgesia with significantly less motor block than a similar concentration of bupivacaine with fentanyl during labor. Whether this statistical reduction in motor block improves clinical outcome or is applicable to anesthesia practices which do not use the patient-controlled epidural analgesia technique remains to be determined.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. H. Halpern and B. Carvalho
Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia for Labor
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2009; 108(3): 921 - 928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
I. Smet, E. Vlaminck, and M. Vercauteren
Randomized controlled trial of patient-controlled epidural analgesia after orthopaedic surgery with sufentanil and ropivacaine 0.165% or levobupivacaine 0.125%
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2008; 100(1): 99 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
Y. Beilin, N. R. Guinn, H. H. Bernstein, J. Zahn, S. Hossain, and C. A. Bodian
Local Anesthetics and Mode of Delivery: Bupivacaine Versus Ropivacaine Versus Levobupivacaine
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2007; 105(3): 756 - 763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
K. M. Tran, T. J. Ganley, L. Wells, A. Ganesh, K. I. Minger, and G. Cucchiaro
Intraarticular Bupivacaine-Clonidine-Morphine Versus Femoral-Sciatic Nerve Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2005; 101(5): 1304 - 1310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. B. Lee, W. D. Ngan Kee, F. F. Ng, T. K. Lau, and E. L. Y. Wong
Epidural Infusions of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine for Labor Analgesia: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Obstetric Outcome
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2004; 98(4): 1145 - 1152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J.-M. Bernard, D. Le Roux, and J. Frouin
Ropivacaine and Fentanyl Concentrations in Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia During Labor: A Volume-Range Study
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2003; 97(6): 1800 - 1807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. W. Hollmann, K. Kurz, S. Herroeder, D. Struemper, K. Hahnenkamp, N. S. Berkelmans, C. G. den Bakker, and M. E. Durieux
The Effects of S(-)-, R(+)-, and Racemic Bupivacaine on Lysophosphatidate-Induced Priming of Human Neutrophils
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2003; 97(4): 1053 - 1058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
L. S. Polley and M. O. Columb
Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine: Concentrating on Dosing!
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2003; 96(5): 1251 - 1253.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. H. Halpern and V. Walsh
Epidural Ropivacaine Versus Bupivacaine for Labor: A Meta-Analysis
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2003; 96(5): 1473 - 1479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. Landau, E. Schiffer, M. Morales, G. Savoldelli, and C. Kern
The Dose-Sparing Effect of Clonidine Added to Ropivacaine for Labor Epidural Analgesia
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2002; 95(3): 728 - 734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Senard, J. L. Joris, D. Ledoux, P. J. Toussaint, B. Lahaye-Goffart, and M. L. Lamy
A Comparison of 0.1% and 0.2% Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine Combined with Morphine for Postoperative Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia After Major Abdominal Surgery
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2002; 95(2): 444 - 449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
H. J. Clement, L. Caruso, F. Lopez, F. Broisin, M. Blanc-Jouvan, E. Derre-Brunet, A. Thomasson, G. Leboucher, and J. P. Viale
Epidural analgesia with 0.15% ropivacaine plus sufentanil 0.5 {micro}g ml-1versus 0.10% bupivacaine plus sufentanil 0.5 {micro}g ml-1: a double-blind comparison during labour
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2002; 88(6): 809 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. D. Owen, J. A. Thomas, T. Smith, L. C. Harris, and R. D'Angelo
Ropivacaine 0.075% and Bupivacaine 0.075% with Fentanyl 2 {micro}g/mL are Equivalent for Labor Epidural Analgesia
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2002; 94(1): 179 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
Y. Pouzeratte, J. M. Delay, G. Brunat, G. Boccara, C. Vergne, S. Jaber, J. M. Fabre, P. Colson, and C. Mann
Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia After Abdominal Surgery: Ropivacaine Versus Bupivacaine
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2001; 93(6): 1587 - 1592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. J. Pinder, M. Dresner, R. D'Angelo, M. Owen, and K. Nelson
Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine with Fentanyl for Labor Epidural Anesthesia Response
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2000; 91(5): 1310 - 1311.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
L. S. Polley, M. O. Columb, R. D'Angelo, and M. D. Owen
Potency, Impotency, and Importance! Response
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2000; 91(3): 765 - 766.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.