| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||



Departments of
*Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine and
Pediatrics, Childrens Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;
Departments of Anesthesiology and Pediatrics, Childrens National Medical Center, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC;
§Department of Anesthesia and Pediatrics, Childrens Hospital and Regional Medical Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington;
||Department of Anesthesiology, Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania;
¶Department of Anesthesiology, Primary Childrens Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah;
#Anesthesia Clinical Development and
**Department of Clinical Statistics, Glaxo Wellcome, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
Address correspondence to Peter J. Davis, MD, Department of Anesthesia, Childrens Hospital of Pittsburgh, 3705 Fifth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2583.
We compared, in a double-blinded manner, the anesthetic maintenance and recovery properties of remifentanil with a clinically comparable fentanyl-based anesthetic technique in pediatric ambulatory surgical patients. Anesthesia was induced with either halothane or sevoflurane and nitrous oxide and oxygen. Patients were randomized (computer generated) to receive either remifentanil or fentanyl in a blinded syringe with nitrous oxide and oxygen in one of four possibilities: halothane/remifentanil, halothane/fentanyl, sevoflurane/remifentanil or sevoflurane/fentanyl. In patients receiving remifentanil, a placebo bolus was administered, and a continuous infusion (0.25 µg · kg-1 · min-1) was begun. In patients receiving fentanyl, a bolus (2 µg/kg) was administered followed by a placebo continuous infusion. The time from discontinuation of the anesthetic to extubation, discharge from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), and discharge to home, as well as pain scores, were assessed by a blinded nurse observer. Systolic blood pressure and heart rate were noted at selected times, and adverse events were recorded. Remifentanil provided faster extubation times and higher pain-discomfort scores. PACU and hospital discharge times were similar. There were no statistical differences among the groups for adverse events. There were statistically, but not clinically, significant differences in hemodynamic variables. We noted that continuous infusions of remifentanil were intraoperatively as effective as bolus fentanyl. Although patients could be tracheally extubated earlier with remifentanil, this did not translate to earlier PACU or hospital discharge times. In addition, remifentanil was associated with higher postoperative pain scores. The frequent incidence of postoperative pain observed in the postoperative recovery room suggests that better intraoperative prophylactic analgesic regimens for postoperative pain control are necessary to optimize remifentanils use as an anesthetic for children.
Implications: This is a study designed to examine the efficacy and safety of a short-acting opioid, remifentanil, when used in pediatric patients. The frequent incidence of postoperative pain observed in the postoperative recovery room suggests that better intraoperative prophylactic analgesic regimens for postoperative pain control are necessary to optimize remifentanils use as an anesthetic for children.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. H. Park, A. L. Pappas, E. Fluder, S. Creech, R. A. Lugo, and A. Hotaling Effect of Perioperative Administration of Ropivacaine With Epinephrine on Postoperative Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy Recovery Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, April 1, 2004; 130(4): 459 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Davis, J. Galinkin, F. X. McGowan, A. M. Lynn, M. Yaster, M. F. Rabb, E. J. Krane, C. D. Kurth, R. H. Blum, L. Maxwell, et al. A Randomized Multicenter Study of Remifentanil Compared with Halothane in Neonates and Infants Undergoing Pyloromyotomy. I. Emergence and Recovery Profiles Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2001; 93(6): 1380 - 1386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Ross, P. J. Davis, G. deL. Dear, B. Ginsberg, F. X. McGowan, R. D. Stiller, L. G. Henson, C. Huffman, and K. T. Muir Pharmacokinetics of Remifentanil in Anesthetized Pediatric Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery or Diagnostic Procedures Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2001; 93(6): 1393 - 1401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Beers, J. R. Calimlim, E. Uddoh, B. F. Esposito, and E. M. Camporesi A Comparison of the Cost-Effectiveness of Remifentanil Versus Fentanyl as an Adjuvant to General Anesthesia for Outpatient Gynecologic Surgery Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2000; 91(6): 1420 - 1425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|