JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow En Espanol
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (31)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Decker, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davis, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Decker, M. D.
Anesth Analg 2000;90:863-871
© 2000 International Anesthesia Research Society


PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA

A Randomized, Double-Blinded Study of Remifentanil Versus Fentanyl for Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy Surgery in Pediatric Ambulatory Surgical Patients

Peter J. Davis, MD*,{dagger}, Julia C. Finkel, MD{ddagger}, Rosemary J. Orr, MD§, Lisa Fazi, MD||, John J. Mulroy, MD, Susan K. Woelfel, MD*, Raafat S. Hannallah, MD{ddagger}, Anne M. Lynn, MD§, C. Dean Kurth, MD||, Michele Moro, MD*, Lynn G. Henson, PharmD#, David K. Goodman, BS#, and Meredith D. Decker, MS**

Departments of *Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine and {dagger}Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; {ddagger}Departments of Anesthesiology and Pediatrics, Children’s National Medical Center, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC; §Department of Anesthesia and Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital and Regional Medical Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington; ||Department of Anesthesiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; ¶Department of Anesthesiology, Primary Children’s Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah; #Anesthesia Clinical Development and **Department of Clinical Statistics, Glaxo Wellcome, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

Address correspondence to Peter J. Davis, MD, Department of Anesthesia, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, 3705 Fifth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2583.

We compared, in a double-blinded manner, the anesthetic maintenance and recovery properties of remifentanil with a clinically comparable fentanyl-based anesthetic technique in pediatric ambulatory surgical patients. Anesthesia was induced with either halothane or sevoflurane and nitrous oxide and oxygen. Patients were randomized (computer generated) to receive either remifentanil or fentanyl in a blinded syringe with nitrous oxide and oxygen in one of four possibilities: halothane/remifentanil, halothane/fentanyl, sevoflurane/remifentanil or sevoflurane/fentanyl. In patients receiving remifentanil, a placebo bolus was administered, and a continuous infusion (0.25 µg · kg-1 · min-1) was begun. In patients receiving fentanyl, a bolus (2 µg/kg) was administered followed by a placebo continuous infusion. The time from discontinuation of the anesthetic to extubation, discharge from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), and discharge to home, as well as pain scores, were assessed by a blinded nurse observer. Systolic blood pressure and heart rate were noted at selected times, and adverse events were recorded. Remifentanil provided faster extubation times and higher pain-discomfort scores. PACU and hospital discharge times were similar. There were no statistical differences among the groups for adverse events. There were statistically, but not clinically, significant differences in hemodynamic variables. We noted that continuous infusions of remifentanil were intraoperatively as effective as bolus fentanyl. Although patients could be tracheally extubated earlier with remifentanil, this did not translate to earlier PACU or hospital discharge times. In addition, remifentanil was associated with higher postoperative pain scores. The frequent incidence of postoperative pain observed in the postoperative recovery room suggests that better intraoperative prophylactic analgesic regimens for postoperative pain control are necessary to optimize remifentanil’s use as an anesthetic for children.

Implications: This is a study designed to examine the efficacy and safety of a short-acting opioid, remifentanil, when used in pediatric patients. The frequent incidence of postoperative pain observed in the postoperative recovery room suggests that better intraoperative prophylactic analgesic regimens for postoperative pain control are necessary to optimize remifentanil’s use as an anesthetic for children.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
A. H. Park, A. L. Pappas, E. Fluder, S. Creech, R. A. Lugo, and A. Hotaling
Effect of Perioperative Administration of Ropivacaine With Epinephrine on Postoperative Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy Recovery
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, April 1, 2004; 130(4): 459 - 464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. J. Davis, J. Galinkin, F. X. McGowan, A. M. Lynn, M. Yaster, M. F. Rabb, E. J. Krane, C. D. Kurth, R. H. Blum, L. Maxwell, et al.
A Randomized Multicenter Study of Remifentanil Compared with Halothane in Neonates and Infants Undergoing Pyloromyotomy. I. Emergence and Recovery Profiles
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2001; 93(6): 1380 - 1386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. K. Ross, P. J. Davis, G. deL. Dear, B. Ginsberg, F. X. McGowan, R. D. Stiller, L. G. Henson, C. Huffman, and K. T. Muir
Pharmacokinetics of Remifentanil in Anesthetized Pediatric Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery or Diagnostic Procedures
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2001; 93(6): 1393 - 1401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. A. Beers, J. R. Calimlim, E. Uddoh, B. F. Esposito, and E. M. Camporesi
A Comparison of the Cost-Effectiveness of Remifentanil Versus Fentanyl as an Adjuvant to General Anesthesia for Outpatient Gynecologic Surgery
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2000; 91(6): 1420 - 1425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.