JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Palmer, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Alves, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Palmer, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Alves, D. M.
Anesth Analg 2000;90:887-891
© 2000 International Anesthesia Research Society


OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA

Postcesarean Epidural Morphine: A Dose-Response Study

Craig M. Palmer, MD, Wallace M. Nogami, MD, Gretchen Van Maren, MD, and Diane M. Alves, RN

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, Arizona

Address correspondence to Craig M. Palmer, MD, Arizona Health Sciences Center, P.O. Box 245114, Tucson, AZ 85724-5114. Address e-mail to cpalmer{at}u.arizona.edu

The purpose of this study was to describe the dose-response relationship of epidural morphine for postcesarean analgesia for quality of analgesia and relation to the side effects of pruritus, nausea, and vomiting. Sixty term parturients undergoing nonurgent cesarean delivery were enrolled and randomized to receive a single dose of epidural morphine after delivery (0,1.25, 2.5, 3.75, or 5 mg). A patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device provided free access to additional analgesics. PCA morphine use and the incidence and severity of side effects were recorded for 24 h. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance, Student’s t-tests, and {chi}2 analysis. Nonlinear regression was used to describe a dose-response curve. PCA use differed significantly among groups (P < 0.001); PCA use was significantly greater in Group 0 mg than Groups 2.5, 3.75, and 5 mg (P < 0.05). PCA use was also significantly greater in Group 1.25 mg than Groups 3.75 and 5 mg (P < 0.05). Pruritus scores were significantly higher in all groups given epidural morphine than the control group (0 mg) (P < 0.05), but did not differ among the treatment groups (1.25–5 mg), although pruritus scores were significantly higher in treatment groups than in the control (P < 0.05). No relation was found between epidural morphine dose and incidence or severity of nausea and vomiting. We concluded that, for optimal analgesia, augmentation of epidural morphine with systemic analgesics or other epidural medications may be necessary.

Implications: Quality of analgesia increases as the dose of epidural morphine increases to at least 3.75 mg; increasing the dose further to 5 mg did not improve analgesia. Side effects were not dose related. For optimal analgesia, augmentation of epidural morphine with systemic analgesics or other epidural medications may be necessary.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. Carvalho
Respiratory Depression After Neuraxial Opioids in the Obstetric Setting
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2008; 107(3): 956 - 961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. K. Kim, S. B. Nam, M. J. Cho, and Y.-S. Shin
Epidural naloxone reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients receiving epidural sufentanil for postoperative analgesia
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2007; 99(2): 270 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. Carvalho, L. M. Roland, L. F. Chu, V. A. Campitelli III, and E. T. Riley
Single-Dose, Extended-Release Epidural Morphine (DepoDurTM) Compared to Conventional Epidural Morphine for Post-Cesarean Pain
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2007; 105(1): 176 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. Gadsden, S. Hart, and A. C. Santos
Post-Cesarean Delivery Analgesia
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2005; 101(5S_Suppl): S62 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R-J. L. Marcus, C. A. Wong, A. Lehor, R. J. McCarthy, E. Yaghmour, and M. Yilmaz
Postoperative Epidural Morphine for Postpartum Tubal Ligation Analgesia
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2005; 101(3): 876 - 881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. Carvalho, E. Riley, S. E. Cohen, D. Gambling, C. Palmer, H. J. Huffnagle, L. Polley, H. Muir, S. Segal, C. Lihou, et al.
Single-Dose, Sustained-Release Epidural Morphine in the Management of Postoperative Pain After Elective Cesarean Delivery: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2005; 100(4): 1150 - 1158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C. Duale, C. Frey, F. Bolandard, A. Barriere, and P. Schoeffler
Epidural versus intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia after Caesarean section
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2003; 91(5): 690 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
H. K. Eltzschig, E. S. Lieberman, and W. R. Camann
Regional Anesthesia and Analgesia for Labor and Delivery
N. Engl. J. Med., January 23, 2003; 348(4): 319 - 332.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
D. L. Hepner, C. M. Palmer, W. M. Nogami, G. Van Maren, and D. M. Alves
Neuraxial Opioids and Respiratory Depression Response
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2000; 91(6): 1560 - 1561.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.