| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Christine G. Cattaneo, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Halsted 842, 600 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD, 21287. Address e-mail to ccattaneo{at}jhmi.edu
We tested the hypotheses that accuracy and precision of available temperature monitoring methods are different between spinal anesthesia (SA) and general anesthesia (GA), and that patients receiving SA are at equal risk for hypothermia as those receiving GA. Patients scheduled for radical retropubic prostatectomy were enrolled. Either GA (n = 16) or SA (n = 16) was given according to patient and clinician preference. Temperatures were monitored with thermocouple probes at the tympanic membrane, axilla, rectum, and forehead skin surface. Tympanic temperatures were also measured with an infrared device, and forehead skin temperatures were monitored with two brands of liquid crystal thermometer strips. Accuracy and precision of these monitoring methods were determined by using tympanic membrane temperature, measured by thermocouple, as the reference core temperature (Tc). At the end of surgery, Tc was similar between SA (35.0 ± 0.1°C) and GA (35.2 ± 0.1°C) (P = 0.44). Accuracy and precision of each temperature monitoring method were similar between SA and GA. Rectal temperature monitoring offered the greatest combination of accuracy and precision. All other methods underestimated Tc. These findings suggest that patients receiving SA or GA are at equal and significant risk for hypothermia, and should have their temperatures carefully monitored, recognizing that most monitoring methods underestimate Tc.
Implications: Body temperature should be monitored during spinal anesthesia because patients are at significant risk for hypothermia. Rectal temperature is a valid method of measuring core temperature, whereas other methods tend to underestimate true core temperature.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Kimberger, R. Thell, M. Schuh, J. Koch, D. I. Sessler, and A. Kurz Accuracy and precision of a novel non-invasive core thermometer Br. J. Anaesth., May 29, 2009; (2009) aep134v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Hannenberg and D. I. Sessler Improving Perioperative Temperature Management Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2008; 107(5): 1454 - 1457. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kiya, M. Yamakage, T. Hayase, J.-I. Satoh, and A. Namiki The Usefulness of an Earphone-Type Infrared Tympanic Thermometer for Intraoperative Core Temperature Monitoring Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2007; 105(6): 1688 - 1692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Kimberger, D. Cohen, U. Illievich, and R. Lenhardt Temporal Artery Versus Bladder Thermometry During Perioperative and Intensive Care Unit Monitoring Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2007; 105(4): 1042 - 1047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Lawson, E. J. Bridges, I. Ballou, R. Eraker, S. Greco, J. Shively, and V. Sochulak Accuracy and Precision of Noninvasive Temperature Measurement in Adult Intensive Care Patients Am. J. Crit. Care., September 1, 2007; 16(5): 485 - 496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. G. Fritz, H. Hoff, M. Hartmann, W. Karzai, and K. R. G. Schwarzkopf The Effects of Urapidil on Thermoregulatory Thresholds in Volunteers Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2002; 94(3): 626 - 630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Frank Hypothermia After Vascular Surgery: Complications, Prevention, and Treatment Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, November 1, 2000; 4(4): 244 - 255. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
|