| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||





Departments of
*Anesthesiology and
Pediatric Surgery, Bnai Zion Medical Center; and
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Rambam Medical Center; and B. Rappaport, Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel
Address correspondence and reprint requests to L. Gaitini, MD, Director, Department of Anesthesiology, Bnai Zion Medical Center, P.O. Box 4940, 31048, Haifa, Israel. Address e-mail to gaitini{at}netvision.net.il
We evaluated the effect of adding fentanyl to bupivacaine, compared with bupivacaine alone, on the stress response. The effect was evaluated by determining blood levels of epinephrine (E) and norepinephrine (NE) in pediatric patients receiving caudal epidural blocks. Sixty children, 18 yr of age, scheduled for elective herniorrhaphy, were randomly allocated to two groups of 30 patients each. Group A received inhaled anesthesia and caudal epidural block with bupivacaine 0.25% alone, 1.0 mL/kg. Group B received identical anesthesia; however, fentanyl 1 µg/kg was added to the bupivacaine in the caudal block. Blood samples for E and NE plasma levels were drawn at induction time (H0), at the end of surgery (H1), and in the postanesthesia care unit (H2). In both groups, there was a significant decrease in the E and NE plasma levels, when comparing H1 and H2 with H0 within the same group (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the E and NE plasma levels between the two groups at H0, H1, and H2 (P = 0.5, P = 0.12, P = 0.5, respectively). Pain scores (modified Childrens Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Score) were also similar in both groups (P = 0.19). This study suggests that adding fentanyl 1 µg/kg to bupivacaine in the caudal epidural block in children does not influence plasma levels of E and NE, nor does it improve the analgesic intensity of the caudal block.
Implications: This study demonstrates that adding fentanyl to bupivacaine for caudal epidural blocks has no beneficial effect on the stress response in pediatric patients undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy, as evaluated by plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine values, compared with bupivacaine alone.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. R. Vetter, D. Carvallo, J. L. Johnson, M. S. Mazurek, and R. G. Presson Jr A Comparison of Single-Dose Caudal Clonidine, Morphine, or Hydromorphone Combined with Ropivacaine in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Ureteral Reimplantation Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2007; 104(6): 1356 - 1363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kawaraguchi, T. Otomo, C. Ota, N. Uchida, A. Taniguchi, and S. Inoue A prospective, double-blind, randomized trial of caudal block using ropivacaine 0.2% with or without fentanyl 1 {micro}g kg-1 in children Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2006; 97(6): 858 - 861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Mahajan, V. K. Grover, and P. Chari Caudal neostigmine with bupivacaine produces a dose-independent analgesic effect in children: [L'administration caudale de neostigmine avec bupivacaine produit une analgesie non reliee a la dose] Can J Anesth, August 1, 2004; 51(7): 702 - 706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|