JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kopman, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by Neuman, G. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kopman, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by Neuman, G. G.
Anesth Analg 2000;90:1191-1197
© 2000 International Anesthesia Research Society


GENERAL ARTICLES

An Alternate Method for Estimating the Dose-Response Relationships of Neuromuscular Blocking Drugs

Aaron F. Kopman, MD*, Monika M. Klewicka, BA{dagger}, and George G. Neuman, MD*

*Department of Clinical Anesthesiology, New York Medical College, Valhalla; and {dagger}Department of Anesthesiology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, New York, New York

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Aaron F. Kopman, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Room NR 408, St. Vincent’s Hospital and Medical Center, 170 W. 12th St., New York, NY 10011. Address e-mail to AKopman{at}interport.net

Slopes of the dose-response relationships for all available neuromuscular blocking drugs appear to be essentially parallel and to approximate a log-dose/logit value of 4.75. We tested the possibility of estimating both 50% effective dose (ED50) and 95% effective dose (ED95) values from a single dose-response data point when that slope is postulated. We compared the ED50 and ED95 values of rocuronium and succinylcholine calculated by using traditional log-dose/logit regression analysis with the same values obtained by averaging individual estimates of potency as determined by using the Hill equation. After the induction of anesthesia (propofol/alfentanil), tracheal intubation was accomplished without the administration of neuromuscular blocking drugs. Anesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide and propofol. The evoked electromyographic response to 0.10-Hz single stimuli was continuously recorded. After baseline stabilization, a single IV bolus of succinylcholine (0.08–0.26 mg/kg, n = 50) or rocuronium (0.13–0.30 mg/kg, n = 40) was administered and the peak effect noted. By using log-dose/logit regression analysis, we calculated ED50 and ED95 values for rocuronium of 0.17 and 0.33 mg/kg and 0.14 and 0.27 mg/kg for succinylcholine. When potency was calculated from the Hill equation, the resultant ED50 and ED95 values did not differ by more than ±4% from those obtained by using regression analysis. Averaging of single-dose estimates of neuromuscular potency provides a useful adjunct and reasonable alternative to conventional regression analysis.

Implications: Averaging of single-dose estimates of neuromuscular potency provides a useful adjunct and reasonable alternative to conventional regression analysis.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. F. Kopman
Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid tracheal intubation.
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2006; 102(6): 1912 - 1912.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. F. Kopman, W. A. Chin, J. Moe, and R. Malik
The Effect of Nitrous Oxide on the Dose-Response Relationship of Rocuronium
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2005; 100(5): 1343 - 1347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
D. Steinberg
ROCURONIUM - VECURONIUM INTERACTION REVISITED BY AN ALTERNATE METHOD
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2003; 50(90001): A61 - 61.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
V. Nigrovic, M. Paul, C. H. Kindler, and C. S. Yost
The Potency of New Muscle Relaxants on Recombinant Muscle-Type Acetylcholine Receptors * Response
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2002; 95(5): 1459 - 1459.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
H. Itoh, K. Shibata, and S. Nitta
Sensitivity to Vecuronium in Seropositive and Seronegative Patients with Myasthenia Gravis
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2002; 95(1): 109 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. F. Kopman, N. A. Khan, and G. G. Neuman
Precurarization and Priming: A Theoretical Analysis of Safety and Timing
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2001; 93(5): 1253 - 1236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. F. Kopman, M. M. Klewicka, and G. G. Neuman
Reexamined: The Recommended Endotracheal Intubating Dose for Nondepolarizing Neuromuscular Blockers of Rapid Onset
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2001; 93(4): 954 - 959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.