JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nishikawa, K.
Right arrow Articles by Namiki, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nishikawa, K.
Right arrow Articles by Namiki, A.
Anesth Analg 2000;90:1203-1207
© 2000 International Anesthesia Research Society


GENERAL ARTICLES

A Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes After Endotracheal Intubation by Using the Lightwand Device and the Laryngoscope in Normotensive and Hypertensive Patients

Kohki Nishikawa, MD, Keiichi Omote, MD, Shin Kawana, MD, and Akiyoshi Namiki, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, Sapporo Medical University, School of Medicine, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Japan

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Kohki Nishikawa, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, S-1, W-16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, 060-0061, Japan.

We compared the effects of the lightwand technique on hemodynamic responses, time-to-intubation, number of attempts, and complications during tracheal intubation with those of direct-vision laryngoscopy in normotensive (LN and TN group; n = 20, respectively) and hypertensive (LH and TH group; n = 20, respectively) patients. Lightwand or laryngoscopic oral endotracheal intubation was performed after the induction of anesthesia with fentanyl and propofol and muscle relaxation with vecuronium. Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate were recorded, and the change from "before intubation" to "immediately after intubation" ({Delta}P) in each variable was calculated. In normotensive patients, significantly larger {Delta}P in systolic blood pressure was observed in the LN group than in the TN group (P < 0.05). In hypertensive patients, there were no significant differences between the LH group and the TH group in {Delta}P after intubation. The time-to-intubation and number of attempts in the lightwand groups were significantly longer and more frequent than those in the laryngoscope groups (P < 0.05). The number of patients who complained of hoarseness was larger in the lightwand groups than in the laryngoscope groups (P < 0.05). We conclude that the lightwand technique significantly attenuates hemodynamic changes after intubation in comparison with the laryngoscopic technique in normotensive patients. However, in hypertensive patients, there is no difference in hemodynamic changes between the two techniques.

Implications: A lightwand technique was accompanied by less hemodynamic changes after tracheal intubation than the laryngoscopic technique in normotensive patients. In hypertensive patients, however, no difference was found between the two techniques.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
F. R. Montes, J. C. Giraldo, L. A. Betancur, J. D. Rincon, I. E. Rincon, M. V. Vanegas, and H. Charris
Endotracheal intubation with a lightwand or a laryngoscope results in similar hemodynamic variations in patients with coronary artery disease: [L'intubation endotracheale avec stylet lumineux ou laryngoscope produit des variations hemodynamiques comparables chez des malades atteints de cardiopathie ischemique]
Can J Anesth, October 1, 2003; 50(8): 824 - 828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Takahashi, T. Mizutani, M. Miyabe, and H. Toyooka
Hemodynamic Responses to Tracheal Intubation with Laryngoscope Versus Lightwand Intubating Device (Trachlight(R)) in Adults with Normal Airway
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2002; 95(2): 480 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
Y. U. Adachi, M. Satomoto, H. Higuchi, and K. Watanabe
Fentanyl Attenuates the Hemodynamic Response to Endotracheal Intubation More Than the Response to Laryngoscopy
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2002; 95(1): 233 - 237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
K. Nishikawa, M. Kawamata, and A. Namiki
Lightwand intubation is associated with less hemodynamic changes than fibreoptic intubation in normotensive, but not in hypertensive patients over the age of 60 : [L'intubation avec stylet lumineux, compare au fibroscope, entraine moins de changements hemodynamiques chez les patients normotendus, non chez les hypertendus, de plus de 60 ans]
Can J Anesth, December 1, 2001; 48(11): 1148 - 1154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
A. Kimura, M. Yamakage, X. Chen, Y. Kamada, and A. Namiki
Use of the fibreoptic stylet scope (StyletscopeTM) reduces the hemodynamic response to intubation in normotensive and hypertensive patients : [L'utilisation d'un stylet fibroscopique (StyletscopeTM) reduit la reponse hemodynamique a l'intubation chez les patients normotendus et hypertendus]
Can J Anesth, October 1, 2001; 48(9): 919 - 923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch Emergency Med.Home page
Lighted Stylet vs. Conventional Laryngoscopy
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, July 5, 2000; 2000(705): 5 - 5.
[Full Text]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.