JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casati, A.
Right arrow Articles by Torri, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Casati, A.
Right arrow Articles by Torri, G.
Anesth Analg 2000;91:181-184
© 2000 International Anesthesia Research Society


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE

The Effects of the Single or Multiple Injection Technique on the Onset Time of Femoral Nerve Blocks with 0.75% Ropivacaine

Andrea Casati, MD, Guido Fanelli, MD, Paolo Beccaria, MD, Gianluca Cappelleri, MD, Marco Berti, MD, Giorgio Aldegheri, MD, and Giorgio Torri, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Milan and IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Andrea Casati, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy. Address e-mail to casati.andrea{at}hsr.it

We evaluated the effect of the injection technique on the onset time and efficacy of femoral nerve block performed with 0.75% ropivacaine. A total of 30 patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery were randomly allocated to receive femoral nerve blockade with 0.75% ropivacaine by using either a single injection (Single group, n = 15) or multiple injection (Multiple group, n = 15). Nerve blocks were placed by using a short-beveled, Teflon-coated, stimulating needle. The stimulation frequency was set at 2 Hz, and the intensity of stimulating current, initially set at 1 mA, was gradually decreased to <0.5 mA after each muscular twitch was observed. In the Single group, 12 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine was slowly injected, as soon as the first muscular twitch was observed. In the Multiple group, the stimulating needle was inserted and redirected, eliciting each of the following muscular twitches: contraction of vastus medialis, vastus intermedius, and vastus lateralis. At each muscular twitch, 4 mL of the study solution was injected. Placing the block required 4.2 ± 1.7 min (median, 5 min; range, 2–8 min) in the Multiple group and 3.4 ± 2.2 min (median, 3 min; range, 1–5 min) in the Single group (P = 0.02). Onset of nerve block (complete loss of pinprick sensation in the femoral nerve distribution with concomitant inability to elevate the leg from the operating table with the hip flexed) required 10 ± 3.7 min in the Multiple group (median, 10 min; range, 5–20 min) and 30 ± 11 min in the Single group (median, 30 min; range, 10–50 min) (P < 0.0005). Propofol sedation was never required to complete surgery; although 0.1 mg fentanyl at trocar insertion was required in two patients of the Multiple group (13%) and nine patients of the Single group (60%) (P = 0.02). We conclude that searching for multiple muscular twitches shortened the onset time and improved the quality of femoral nerve block performed with small volumes of 0.75% ropivacaine.

Implications: This prospective, randomized, blinded study was conducted to evaluate the effect of searching for multiple muscular twitches when performing femoral nerve block with small volumes of 0.75% ropivacaine. Our results demonstrated that multiple injections markedly shortened the onset time and improved the quality of nerve blockade. This technique-related effect must be carefully considered when different clinical studies evaluating the use of new local anesthetic solutions for peripheral nerve blocks are compared.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M.-C. Desgagnes, S. Levesque, N. Dion, M.-J. Nadeau, D. Cote, J. Brassard, P. C. Nicole, and A. F. Turgeon
A Comparison of a Single or Triple Injection Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Block: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2009; 109(2): 668 - 672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. Rodriguez, M. Barcena, M. Taboada-Muniz, J. Lagunilla, and J. Alvarez
A Comparison of Single Versus Multiple Injections on the Extent of Anesthesia with Coracoid Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2004; 99(4): 1225 - 1230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Casati, G. Fanelli, L. Magistris, P. Beccaria, M. Berti, and G. Torri
Minimum Local Anesthetic Volume Blocking the Femoral Nerve in 50% of Cases: A Double-Blinded Comparison Between 0.5% Ropivacaine and 0.5% Bupivacaine
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2001; 92(1): 205 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Casati, L. Magistris, G. Fanelli, P. Beccaria, G. Cappelleri, G. Aldegheri, and G. Torri
Small-Dose Clonidine Prolongs Postoperative Analgesia After Sciatic-Femoral Nerve Block with 0.75% Ropivacaine for Foot Surgery
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2000; 91(2): 388 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.