JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, P. M.
Anesth Analg 2000;91:276-282
© 2000 International Anesthesia Research Society


CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIA

The Concentration-Dependent Effects of Propofol on Rat Ventricular Myocytes

Duncan L. Hamilton, MB, ChB*, Mark R. Boyett, PhD*, Simon M. Harrison, PhD*, Lucinda A. Davies, BSc*, and Philip M. Hopkins, MD{dagger}

*School of Biomedical Sciences and {dagger}Academic Unit of Anaesthesia, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Philip M. Hopkins, MD, Academic Unit of Anaesthesia, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK. Address e-mail to p.m.hopkins{at}leeds.ac.uk

Whether propofol contributes a direct negative inotropic effect is controversial. Our principal aim in this study was to determine whether negative inotropic effects of propofol occur at clinically relevant concentrations. We constructed the concentration-response relationship for the negative inotropic effects on intact, isolated, stimulated rat ventricular myocytes. Contraction was measured as cell shortening by using an optical system. Propofol was applied as dilutions of the commercial preparation in physiological saline solution. The drug vehicle had a minimal effect on myocyte contractility. Propofol produced a concentration-dependent reduction in evoked contraction at concentrations greater than 5 µM. The maximum effect was observed at >100 µM, with the K0.5 calculated to be 34.5 µM (95% CI, 21.8–54.7 µM). In further experiments, we investigated the relationship between changes in contractility and changes in Ca2+ transient (measured by using fura-2 fluorescence) after the application of propofol. By using the shift in the relationship of the cell length to fura-2 fluorescence ratio in the relaxation phase of a contraction as an index of Ca2+ response of the myofilaments, we demonstrated that some of the negative inotropic effect of propofol may be caused by a reduction in myofilament Ca2+ sensitivity. We confirmed this by comparing the reduction in contractility in the presence of propofol with that caused by reducing the extracellular Ca2+ concentration. We observed that, for a decrease in the fura-2 fluorescence ratio of 21%, propofol caused a 12% (95% CI, 2% to 22%) greater reduction in contractility than predicted from reducing the extracellular Ca2+ concentration. However, the K0.5 for the negative inotropic effect of propofol we observed is more than 80 times the 50% effective concentration value for anesthesia. The potential relevance of these findings for clinical use of propofol in humans is discussed.

Implications: By using intact, isolated rat heart ventricle cells, we investigated the mechanisms and concentration dependence of the depressant effect of propofol on contractility of the heart. We conclude that direct effects of propofol on the heart are unlikely to be of significance at the clinical dosage usually given.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
G. Gouvea, R. Diaz, L. Auler, and J. M. Martinho
Evaluation of the right ventricular ejection fraction during orthotopic liver transplantation under propofol anaesthesia
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2008; 101(2): 161 - 165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. G. Memtsoudis, A. H. S. The, and P. M. Heerdt
Autonomic Mechanisms in the Age-Related Hypotensive Effect of Propofol
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2005; 100(1): 111 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
Z. Xia, D. V. Godin, and D. M. Ansley
Propofol enhances ischemic tolerance of middle-aged rat hearts: effects on 15-F2t-isoprostane formation and tissue antioxidant capacity
Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2003; 59(1): 113 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.