JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (32) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zarate, E. Articles by Chi, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zarate, E. Articles by Chi, L.

---

CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIA

Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia: Use of Remifentanil Combined with Intrathecal Morphine as an Alternative to Sufentanil During Desflurane Anesthesia

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas

Address correspondence to Paul F. White, PhD, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., F2.208, Dallas, TX 75235-9068. Address e-mail to paul.white{at}email.swmed.edu

The purpose of this cardiac fast-track study was to evaluate the use of remifentanil (R) combined with intrathecal (IT) morphine as an alternative to sufentanil (S) during desflurane anesthesia with respect to postoperative pain control. Prior to entering the operating room, patients in the R group (n = 20) received morphine, 8 µg/kg IT. Anesthesia was induced using a standardized anesthetic technique in all patients. In the R group, anesthesia was maintained with R, 0.1 µg · kg^-1 · min^-1 in combination with desflurane 3–10%. In the S group (n = 20), patients received S 0.3 µg · kg^-1 · h^-1 and desflurane 3–10%. There were no differences between the two groups with respect to time from arrival in the intensive care unit to tracheal extubation (5.1 ± 4.3 h vs 5.8 ± 6.7 h for R and S groups, respectively). After extubation, patients in the R group had significantly lower visual analog pain scores, reduced patient-controlled analgesic requirements, and greater satisfaction with their perioperative pain management, compared with patients in the S group. We conclude that R combined with IT morphine provided superior pain control after cardiac surgery compared with a S-based general anesthetic technique.

Implications: As part of a cardiac fast-tracking program involving desflurane anesthesia, the use of intrathecal morphine in combination with a remifentanil infusion provided improved postoperative pain control, compared with IV sufentanil alone.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. F. White, H. Kehlet, J. M. Neal, T. Schricker, D. B. Carr, F. Carli, and the Fast-Track Surgery Study Group The Role of the Anesthesiologist in Fast-Track Surgery: From Multimodal Analgesia to Perioperative Medical Care Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2007; 104(6): 1380 - 1396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Lecomte, A. Ouattara, Y. Le Manach, M. Landi, P. Coriat, and B. Riou The Coronary and Myocardial Effects of Remifentanil and Sufentanil in the Erythrocyte-Perfused Isolated Rabbit Heart. Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2006; 103(1): 9 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Chaney Intrathecal and Epidural Anesthesia and Analgesia for Cardiac Surgery Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2006; 102(1): 45 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. B. Hammer, C. Ramamoorthy, H. Cao, G. D. Williams, M. G. Boltz, K. Kamra, and D. R. Drover Postoperative Analgesia After Spinal Blockade in Infants and Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgery Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2005; 100(5): 1283 - 1288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Djaiani, L. Fedorko, and W. S. Beattie Regional Anesthesia in Cardiac Surgery: A Friend or A Foe? Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2005; 9(1): 87 - 104. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Ouattara, G. Boccara, S. Lemaire, U. Kockler, M. Landi, E. Vaissier, P. Leger, and P. Coriat Target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil in cardiac anaesthesia: influence of age on predicted effect-site concentrations{dagger} Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2003; 90(5): 617 - 622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Lena, N. Balarac, J. J. Arnulf, J. Teboul, and F. Bonnet Intrathecal morphine and clonidine for coronary artery bypass grafting Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2003; 90(3): 300 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Mollhoff, L. Herregods, A. Moerman, D. Blake, C. MacAdams, R. Demeyere, K. Kirno, T. Dybvik, S. Shaikh, and t. Remifentanil Study Group Comparative efficacy and safety of remifentanil and fentanyl in fast track' coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized, double-blind study Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2001; 87(5): 718 - 726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Engoren, G. Luther, and N. Fenn-Buderer A Comparison of Fentanyl, Sufentanil, and Remifentanil for Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2001; 93(4): 859 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Coriat and M. Beaussier Fast-Tracking After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2001; 92(5): 1081 - 1083. [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999