JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (32)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zarate, E.
Right arrow Articles by Chi, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zarate, E.
Right arrow Articles by Chi, L.
Anesth Analg 2000;91:283-287
© 2000 International Anesthesia Research Society


CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIA

Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia: Use of Remifentanil Combined with Intrathecal Morphine as an Alternative to Sufentanil During Desflurane Anesthesia

Eduardo Zarate, MD, Paige Latham, MD, Paul F. White, PhD, MD, Robert Bossard, MD, Lisa Morse, MD, Linda K. Douning, MD, Chen Shi, MD, and Lei Chi, MD

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas

Address correspondence to Paul F. White, PhD, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., F2.208, Dallas, TX 75235-9068. Address e-mail to paul.white{at}email.swmed.edu

The purpose of this cardiac fast-track study was to evaluate the use of remifentanil (R) combined with intrathecal (IT) morphine as an alternative to sufentanil (S) during desflurane anesthesia with respect to postoperative pain control. Prior to entering the operating room, patients in the R group (n = 20) received morphine, 8 µg/kg IT. Anesthesia was induced using a standardized anesthetic technique in all patients. In the R group, anesthesia was maintained with R, 0.1 µg · kg-1 · min-1 in combination with desflurane 3–10%. In the S group (n = 20), patients received S 0.3 µg · kg-1 · h-1 and desflurane 3–10%. There were no differences between the two groups with respect to time from arrival in the intensive care unit to tracheal extubation (5.1 ± 4.3 h vs 5.8 ± 6.7 h for R and S groups, respectively). After extubation, patients in the R group had significantly lower visual analog pain scores, reduced patient-controlled analgesic requirements, and greater satisfaction with their perioperative pain management, compared with patients in the S group. We conclude that R combined with IT morphine provided superior pain control after cardiac surgery compared with a S-based general anesthetic technique.

Implications: As part of a cardiac fast-tracking program involving desflurane anesthesia, the use of intrathecal morphine in combination with a remifentanil infusion provided improved postoperative pain control, compared with IV sufentanil alone.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. F. White, H. Kehlet, J. M. Neal, T. Schricker, D. B. Carr, F. Carli, and the Fast-Track Surgery Study Group
The Role of the Anesthesiologist in Fast-Track Surgery: From Multimodal Analgesia to Perioperative Medical Care
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2007; 104(6): 1380 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. Lecomte, A. Ouattara, Y. Le Manach, M. Landi, P. Coriat, and B. Riou
The Coronary and Myocardial Effects of Remifentanil and Sufentanil in the Erythrocyte-Perfused Isolated Rabbit Heart.
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2006; 103(1): 9 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. A. Chaney
Intrathecal and Epidural Anesthesia and Analgesia for Cardiac Surgery
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2006; 102(1): 45 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. B. Hammer, C. Ramamoorthy, H. Cao, G. D. Williams, M. G. Boltz, K. Kamra, and D. R. Drover
Postoperative Analgesia After Spinal Blockade in Infants and Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgery
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2005; 100(5): 1283 - 1288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
G. Djaiani, L. Fedorko, and W. S. Beattie
Regional Anesthesia in Cardiac Surgery: A Friend or A Foe?
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2005; 9(1): 87 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. Ouattara, G. Boccara, S. Lemaire, U. Kockler, M. Landi, E. Vaissier, P. Leger, and P. Coriat
Target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil in cardiac anaesthesia: influence of age on predicted effect-site concentrations{dagger}
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2003; 90(5): 617 - 622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
P. Lena, N. Balarac, J. J. Arnulf, J. Teboul, and F. Bonnet
Intrathecal morphine and clonidine for coronary artery bypass grafting
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2003; 90(3): 300 - 303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. Mollhoff, L. Herregods, A. Moerman, D. Blake, C. MacAdams, R. Demeyere, K. Kirno, T. Dybvik, S. Shaikh, and t. Remifentanil Study Group
Comparative efficacy and safety of remifentanil and fentanyl in fast track' coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized, double-blind study
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2001; 87(5): 718 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Engoren, G. Luther, and N. Fenn-Buderer
A Comparison of Fentanyl, Sufentanil, and Remifentanil for Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2001; 93(4): 859 - 864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. Coriat and M. Beaussier
Fast-Tracking After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2001; 92(5): 1081 - 1083.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.