JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mikat-Stevens, M.
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mikat-Stevens, M.
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, R. A.
Anesth Analg 2000;91:312-316
© 2000 International Anesthesia Research Society


AMBULATORY ANESTHESIA

Is Succinylcholine After Pretreatment with d-Tubocurarine and Lidocaine Contraindicated for Outpatient Anesthesia?

Marianne Mikat-Stevens, MD*, Radha Sukhani, MD{dagger}, Ana L. Pappas, MD{ddagger}, Elaine Fluder, RN, MSN{ddagger}, Bruce Kleinman, MD*, and Rom A. Stevens, MD{dagger}

*Department of Anesthesiology, Edward Hines Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines; {dagger}Department of Anesthesiology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago; and {ddagger}Department of Anesthesiology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois

Address correspondence to Dr. Rom Stevens, Department of Anesthesiology, Northwestern University Medical School, 251 East Huron St., Suite 360, Passavant Pavilion, Chicago, IL 60611.

Because succinylcholine has obvious advantages for facilitating endotracheal intubation in the ambulatory setting (e.g., low cost, fast onset, and no need for reversal of neuromuscular block), it is important to determine whether this muscle relaxant is indeed associated with an increased incidence of postoperative myalgias, compared with alternative but more expensive nondepolarizing muscle relaxants. We studied 119 outpatients undergoing endoscopic nasal sinus surgery or septoplasty. The anesthetic technique consisted of propofol/lidocaine for induction, followed by isoflurane/nitrous oxide/oxygen for maintenance. Oral tracheal intubation was performed by using a fiberscope. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two muscle relaxant groups. Group 1 patients received d-tubocurarine 3 mg followed by succinylcholine 1.5 mg/kg. Group 2 patients received mivacurium 0.2 mg/kg. After recovery from anesthesia, patients were asked whether they had any muscle pain and/or stiffness. Pain was categorized by location and quantified by using a verbal scale (from 0 to 10). Analgesic usage and myalgias limiting ambulation were recorded. After discharge from the ambulatory surgery unit, patients were contacted by telephone on Postoperative Day 1. If patients complained of myalgias, they were contacted by telephone on Days 2 and 3. Only one patient (in the mivacurium-treated group) reported myalgia as a limiting factor in ambulation or resumption of normal activity. There were no differences between groups with respect to the incidence (21% in the succinylcholine-treated group and 18% in the mivacurium-treated group), location, or severity of myalgia. In conclusion, succinylcholine (preceded by pretreatment with d-tubocurarine and lidocaine) is not associated with an increased incidence of myalgias, compared with mivacurium, when used to facilitate tracheal intubation in patients undergoing ambulatory nasal surgery.

Implications: The results of this study show that the frequency of muscle pains after surgery in outpatients is approximately 20%, regardless of whether succinylcholine (after precurarization) or mivacurium is used to assist in insertion of the breathing tube.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J.-U. Schreiber, T. Mencke, A. Biedler, O. Furst, S. Kleinschmidt, H. Buchinger, and T. Fuchs-Buder
Postoperative Myalgia After Succinylcholine: No Evidence for an Inflammatory Origin
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2003; 96(6): 1640 - 1644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. Mencke, J.-U. Schreiber, C. Becker, M. Bolte, and T. Fuchs-Buder
Pretreatment Before Succinylcholine for Outpatient Anesthesia?
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2002; 94(3): 573 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
N. Rawal
Analgesia for day-case surgery
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2001; 87(1): 73 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.