JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Naganobu, K.
Right arrow Articles by Ogawa, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Naganobu, K.
Right arrow Articles by Ogawa, H.
Anesth Analg 2000;91:317-321
© 2000 International Anesthesia Research Society


CRITICAL CARE AND TRAUMA

A Comparison of Distilled Water and Normal Saline as Diluents for Endobronchial Administration of Epinephrine in the Dog

Kiyokazu Naganobu, BVSc, Yuzo Hasebe, DVM, Yuka Uchiyama, DVM, Mitsuyoshi Hagio, DVM, and Hiroyuki Ogawa, DVM

Department of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Miyazaki University, Miyazaki, Japan

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Kiyokazu Naganobu, BVSc, Department of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Miyazaki University, Miyazaki 889-2192, Japan. Address e-mail to a0e303u{at}cc.miyazaki-u.ac.jp

We compared the effects of distilled water and normal saline as diluents for the endobronchial administration of epinephrine in anesthetized dogs by using a cross-over design. Six dogs received 2 mL of either normal saline or distilled water into the bronchus, and the other solution was administered 1 wk later. Eight dogs received 0.02 mg/kg epinephrine diluted in either distilled water (E + water) or normal saline (E + saline) to a total volume of 2 mL into the bronchus, and the other solution was administered 1 wk later. Normal saline or distilled water without epinephrine did not affect the plasma epinephrine concentration, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and PaO2. The peak plasma epinephrine concentration was significantly larger after treatment with E + water (26.5 ± 7.9 ng/mL) than after E + saline (2.1 ± 0.7 ng/mL). E + water caused an increase in MAP of 91 ± 24 mm Hg, whereas E + saline did not affect MAP. The maximal decrease in PaO2 after the administration of E + water (14 ± 5 mm Hg) was significantly greater than after E + saline (7 ± 2 mm Hg). In conclusion, distilled water as the diluent for endobronchially administered epinephrine to a total volume of 2 mL allowed better absorption of epinephrine compared with normal saline without a serious detrimental effect on PaO2.

Implications: Using a small volume of distilled water as the diluent for endobronchial epinephrine administration significantly increased epinephrine absorption and arterial pressure in comparison with normal saline, without having a serious detrimental effect on PaO2, in an anesthetized, noncardiopulmonary, resuscitation dog model.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
K-T Chen, H-J Lin, H-W Jeng, C-C Lin, and H-R Guo
The pharmacological effect of epinephrine administration via laryngeal mask airway in a porcine model of asphyxial cardiac arrest
Emerg. Med. J., November 1, 2008; 25(11): 722 - 724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
H. Sunaga, M. Kaneko, and Y. Amaki
The efficacy of intratracheal administration of vecuronium in rats, compared with intravenous and intramuscular administration.
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2006; 103(3): 601 - 607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Part 7.2: Management of Cardiac Arrest
Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24_suppl): IV-58 - IV-66.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Part 4: Advanced Life Support
Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22_suppl): III-25 - III-54.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
Y. Manisterski, Z. Vaknin, R. Ben-Abraham, O. Efrati, D. Lotan, M. Berkovitch, A. Barak, Z. Barzilay, and G. Paret
Endotracheal Epinephrine: A Call for Larger Doses
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2002; 95(4): 1037 - 1041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
Z. Vaknin, Y. Manisterski, R. Ben-Abraham, O. Efrati, D. Lotan, Z. Barzilay, and G. Paret
Is Endotracheal Adrenaline Deleterious Because of the Beta Adrenergic Effect?
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2001; 92(6): 1408 - 1412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. W. Prengel, M. Rembecki, V. Wenzel, and G. Steinbach
A Comparison of the Endotracheal Tube and the Laryngeal Mask Airway as a Route for Endobronchial Lidocaine Administration
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2001; 92(6): 1505 - 1509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
V. Wenzel, A. W. Prengel, and K. H. Lindner
A Strategy to Improve Endobronchial Drug Administration
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2000; 91(2): 255 - 256.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.