Anesth Analg 2000;91:317-321
© 2000 International Anesthesia Research Society
CRITICAL CARE AND TRAUMA
A Comparison of Distilled Water and Normal Saline as Diluents for Endobronchial Administration of Epinephrine in the Dog
Kiyokazu Naganobu, BVSc,
Yuzo Hasebe, DVM,
Yuka Uchiyama, DVM,
Mitsuyoshi Hagio, DVM, and
Hiroyuki Ogawa, DVM
Department of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Miyazaki University, Miyazaki, Japan
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Kiyokazu Naganobu, BVSc, Department of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Miyazaki University, Miyazaki 889-2192, Japan. Address e-mail to a0e303u{at}cc.miyazaki-u.ac.jp
We compared the effects of distilled water and normal saline as diluents for the endobronchial administration of epinephrine in anesthetized dogs by using a cross-over design. Six dogs received 2 mL of either normal saline or distilled water into the bronchus, and the other solution was administered 1 wk later. Eight dogs received 0.02 mg/kg epinephrine diluted in either distilled water (E + water) or normal saline (E + saline) to a total volume of 2 mL into the bronchus, and the other solution was administered 1 wk later. Normal saline or distilled water without epinephrine did not affect the plasma epinephrine concentration, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and PaO2. The peak plasma epinephrine concentration was significantly larger after treatment with E + water (26.5 ± 7.9 ng/mL) than after E + saline (2.1 ± 0.7 ng/mL). E + water caused an increase in MAP of 91 ± 24 mm Hg, whereas E + saline did not affect MAP. The maximal decrease in PaO2 after the administration of E + water (14 ± 5 mm Hg) was significantly greater than after E + saline (7 ± 2 mm Hg). In conclusion, distilled water as the diluent for endobronchially administered epinephrine to a total volume of 2 mL allowed better absorption of epinephrine compared with normal saline without a serious detrimental effect on PaO2.
Implications: Using a small volume of distilled water as the diluent for endobronchial epinephrine administration significantly increased epinephrine absorption and arterial pressure in comparison with normal saline, without having a serious detrimental effect on PaO2, in an anesthetized, noncardiopulmonary, resuscitation dog model.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K-T Chen, H-J Lin, H-W Jeng, C-C Lin, and H-R Guo
The pharmacological effect of epinephrine administration via laryngeal mask airway in a porcine model of asphyxial cardiac arrest
Emerg. Med. J.,
November 1, 2008;
25(11):
722 - 724.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Sunaga, M. Kaneko, and Y. Amaki
The efficacy of intratracheal administration of vecuronium in rats, compared with intravenous and intramuscular administration.
Anesth. Analg.,
September 1, 2006;
103(3):
601 - 607.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Part 7.2: Management of Cardiac Arrest
Circulation,
December 13, 2005;
112(24_suppl):
IV-58 - IV-66.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Part 4: Advanced Life Support
Circulation,
November 29, 2005;
112(22_suppl):
III-25 - III-54.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Manisterski, Z. Vaknin, R. Ben-Abraham, O. Efrati, D. Lotan, M. Berkovitch, A. Barak, Z. Barzilay, and G. Paret
Endotracheal Epinephrine: A Call for Larger Doses
Anesth. Analg.,
October 1, 2002;
95(4):
1037 - 1041.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Vaknin, Y. Manisterski, R. Ben-Abraham, O. Efrati, D. Lotan, Z. Barzilay, and G. Paret
Is Endotracheal Adrenaline Deleterious Because of the Beta Adrenergic Effect?
Anesth. Analg.,
June 1, 2001;
92(6):
1408 - 1412.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. W. Prengel, M. Rembecki, V. Wenzel, and G. Steinbach
A Comparison of the Endotracheal Tube and the Laryngeal Mask Airway as a Route for Endobronchial Lidocaine Administration
Anesth. Analg.,
June 1, 2001;
92(6):
1505 - 1509.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Wenzel, A. W. Prengel, and K. H. Lindner
A Strategy to Improve Endobronchial Drug Administration
Anesth. Analg.,
August 1, 2000;
91(2):
255 - 256.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|