JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fabling, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Borel, C. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fabling, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Borel, C. O.
Anesth Analg 2000;91:358-361
© 2000 International Anesthesia Research Society


NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIA

A Randomized, Double-Blinded Comparison of Ondansetron, Droperidol, and Placebo for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Supratentorial Craniotomy

Jennifer M. Fabling, MB, ChB, FANZCA, Tong J. Gan, MB, FRCA, Habib E. El-Moalem, PhD, David S. Warner, MD, and Cecil O. Borel, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Address correspondence to Cecil Borel, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, DUMC Box 3094, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710. Address e-mail to borel001{at}mc.duke.edu

Nausea or vomiting occurs frequently after craniotomy. Because of the need for frequent postoperative neurological assessment, an effective antiemetic with minimal sedative side effects is needed. Therefore, we compared ondansetron to droperidol in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. A total of 60 adults requiring elective supratentorial craniotomy received standardized IV anesthesia with 4 mg of ondansetron, 0.625 mg of droperidol, or placebo at skin closure. The incidence of postoperative nausea, emesis, pain and sedation scores, and rescue antiemetic use were recorded at 0, 0.5, 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h. All groups were demographically similar. Differences existed for cumulative 8, 12, and 24 h incidences of nausea (24 h, P = 0.03) and emesis (24 h, P = 0.04). Within 4 h, when maximal effect could be expected from treatment, 20% of the ondansetron group, 25% of the droperidol group and 50% of the placebo group received rescue antiemetic (P = 0.12). No differences in pain (P = 0.82) or sedation (P = 0.74) scores were detected. Both ondansetron and droperidol prevent nausea; however, only droperidol reduces emesis after supratentorial craniotomy. The dose of droperidol used was not more sedating than ondansetron. Sustained reduction in nausea and emesis over 24 h indicates a preemptive benefit of prophylactic antiemetic in this surgical population.

Implications: Nausea and vomiting after brain surgery are particularly troubling, because effective treatment may cause sedation, making postoperative neurological assessment difficult. Our study shows that both ondansetron and droperidol are effective in reducing nausea, and that droperidol is particularly effective in reducing vomiting. Neither drug caused more sedation than placebo.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. C. Flynn and E. C. Nemergut
Postoperative nausea and vomiting and pain after transsphenoidal surgery: a review of 877 patients.
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2006; 103(1): 162 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. J. Gan
Risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2006; 102(6): 1884 - 1898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
A. L Kovac
Meta-Analysis of the Use of Rescue Antiemetics Following PONV Prophylactic Failure with 5-HT3 Antagonist/Dexamethasone Versus Single-Agent Therapies
Ann. Pharmacother., May 1, 2006; 40(5): 873 - 887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
J. D Moser, J. B Caldwell, and F J. Rhule
No More Than Necessary: Safety and Efficacy of Low-Dose Promethazine
Ann. Pharmacother., January 1, 2006; 40(1): 45 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. J. Gan, T. Meyer, C. C. Apfel, F. Chung, P. J. Davis, S. Eubanks, A. Kovac, B. K. Philip, D. I. Sessler, J. Temo, et al.
Consensus Guidelines for Managing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2003; 97(1): 62 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crit Care NurseHome page
K. Garrett, K. Tsuruta, S. Walker, S. Jackson, and M. Sweat
Managing Nausea and Vomiting: Current Strategies
Crit. Care Nurse, February 1, 2003; 23(1): 31 - 50.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.