JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shimoda, O.
Right arrow Articles by Ikuta, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shimoda, O.
Right arrow Articles by Ikuta, Y.
Anesth Analg 2000;91:398-402
© 2000 International Anesthesia Research Society


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE

The Current Perception Thresholds Vary Between Horizontal and 70° Tilt-Up Positions

Osamu Shimoda, MD, PhD*, and Yoshihiro Ikuta, MD, PhD{dagger}

*Department of Anesthesiology, Kumamoto University School of Medicine; and {dagger}Surgical Center, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Osamu Shimoda, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Kumamoto University School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan. Address e-mail requests to shimoda{at}kaiju.medic.kumamoto-u.ac.jp

We investigated the influence of posture on current perception threshold (CPT). The subjects consisted of 20 healthy male volunteers (23–31 yr old). At both the horizontal and the 70° tilt-up position (TUP), the CPTs (5, 250, and 2000 Hz) of the middle finger were determined by using the Neurometer CPT/C (Neuropteran, Baltimore, MD). Autonomic nervous activities were evaluated by heart rate variability (HRV) analysis and spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity analysis at the two postures previously mentioned. The three CPTs at the 70° TUP were significantly lower than those at the horizontal posture (5 Hz, P < 0.05; 250 Hz, P < 0.001; 2000 Hz, P < 0.05). The changes in HRV and spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity at the 70° TUP indicated decreasing parasympathetic tone. The CPTs of 5 and 250 Hz were significantly correlated with mean systolic blood pressure at the 70° TUP. The CPT of 2000 Hz was significantly correlated with the 0.15–0.4 Hz component in HRV at both postures. The regression analysis of the difference of 5 Hz CPT with that of the mean systolic blood pressure showed a significant correlation (P < 0.001). To evaluate the clinical course of peripheral nerve disorders, the comparison of CPTs measured during the same posture is important. This suggests that CPTs must be measured at the horizontal posture.

Implications: Current perception thresholds at the 70° tilt-up posture were significantly lower than those at the horizontal posture. When the compensatory mechanism for preserving blood pressure was emphasized, the current perception thresholds would have a relational connection to mean systolic blood pressure, similar to the concept of hypertension-induced hypoalgesia.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
H. N. Chado
Current Perception Thresholds Do Not Vary Significantly
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2001; 93(4): 1079 - 1079.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.