JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, C. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Park, C. K.
Anesth Analg 2000;91:552-557
© 2000 International Anesthesia Research Society


CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIA

The Effect of Patient Positioning on Intraabdominal Pressure and Blood Loss in Spinal Surgery

Chang Kil Park, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, Eulji University School of Medicine, Taejon, Korea

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Chang Kil Park, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Eulji University School of Medicine, 24-14 Mok-dong Joong-ku, Taejon, 301-726, Korea. Address e-mail to pck{at}emc.eulji.ac.kr

Intraabdominal pressure (IAP) can influence blood loss during spinal surgery. We examined the relationship of IAP changes to blood loss with a rectal balloon pressure catheter. Forty patients were randomly assigned to narrow (Group 1) or wide (Group 2) pad support widths of the Wilson frame. IAP was measured when the patient was supine after the induction of anesthesia, prone on a gurney, prone on the Wilson frame before and after incision, and then, again supine after tracheal extubation. IAP in the prone position on the Wilson frame before incision (3.6 cm H2O) in Group 2 was significantly less than in Group 1 (8.8 cm H2O) (P < 0.05). Intraoperative blood loss per vertebra in Group 2 (190 ± 65 mL) was significantly less than in Group 1 (381 ± 236 mL) (P < 0.05). The correlation between blood loss and IAP in the prone position on the Wilson frame in Group 1 was significant (P = 0.0022). In conclusion, IAP and intraoperative blood loss were significantly less in the wide, than in the narrow, pad support width of the Wilson frame. Blood loss tended to increase with an increase in IAP in the narrow pad support width of the Wilson frame.

Implications: The relationship of intraabdominal pressure changes to blood loss were examined with a rectal balloon pressure catheter during spinal surgery. Blood loss tended to increase with an increase in intraabdominal pressure in the narrow pad support width of the Wilson frame.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. A. Hogan, S. C. Harvey, W. F. Conway, J. F. DeRosimo, and R. H. Gross
Superior Vena Cava Compression During Posterior Spinal Fusion for Idiopathic Scoliosis. A Case Report
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2009; 91(3): 696 - 700.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. H. Dauber and S. Roth
Operating Table Failure: Another Hazard of Spine Surgery
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2009; 108(3): 904 - 905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
D. A. Raw, J. K. Beattie, and J. M. Hunter
Anaesthesia for spinal surgery in adults
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2003; 91(6): 886 - 904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.