JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Magnusson, L. Articles by Hedenstierna, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Magnusson, L. Articles by Hedenstierna, G.

---

GENERAL ARTICLES

The Safety of One, or Repeated, Vital Capacity Maneuvers During General Anesthesia

Lennart Magnusson, MD, PhD^*, Arne Tenling, MD, PhD, Robert Lemoine, MD^§, Marieann Högman, PhD, Hans Tydén, MD, PhD, and Göran Hedenstierna, MD, PhD

Departments of *Clinical Physiology, Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, and Clinical Physiology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden; and Departments of *Anesthesiology and §Pathology, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Lennart Magnusson, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital, CHUV BH-10, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland. Address e-mail to Lennart.Magnusson{at}chuv.hospvd.ch

A vital capacity maneuver (VCM) (inflating the lungs to 40 cm H₂O for 15 s) is effective in relieving atelectasis during general anesthesia or after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The study was undertaken to investigate the safety of one or repeated VCM. Five groups of six pigs were studied. Two groups had general anesthesia for 6 h and one group received a VCM every hour. Three other groups received CPB. VCM was performed after CPB in two of these groups. VCM was then repeated every hour in one of the groups. Lung damage was evaluated by extravascular lung water (EVLW) measurement, light microscopy, and the half-time (T_1/2) of disappearance from the lung of a nebulized aerosol containing ^99mTc-DTPA. No changes were noted in extravascular lung water. The pigs subjected to VCM decreased their T_1/2. In the groups exposed to repeated VCM, T_1/2 remained lowered (CPB pigs) or decreased over time (non-CPB pigs). No lung damage could be seen on the morphology study. These results suggest that one VCM is a safe procedure. The increase in lung clearance of ^99mTc-DTPA not associated with an increase in lung water when VCM is repeated may have been caused by an increase in lung volume. Therefore, repeated VCM also appears to be safe.

Implications: This study demonstrates in an animal model that inflating the lung once or repeatedly to the vital capacity is a safe procedure. This maneuver, also called the vital capacity maneuver, can be used to relieve lung collapse which occurs in all patients during general anesthesia.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Phelps, O. S. Cakmakkaya, C. C. Apfel, and O. C. Radke A Simple Clinical Maneuver to Reduce Laparoscopy-Induced Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial Obstet. Gynecol., May 1, 2008; 111(5): 1155 - 1160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Magnusson and D. R. Spahn New concepts of atelectasis during general anaesthesia Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2003; 91(1): 61 - 72. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Benoit, S. Wicky, J.-F. Fischer, P. Frascarolo, C. Chapuis, D. R. Spahn, and L. Magnusson The Effect of Increased FIO2 Before Tracheal Extubation on Postoperative Atelectasis Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2002; 95(6): 1777 - 1781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999