JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sedensky, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sedensky, M. M.
Anesth Analg 2000;91:1007-1012
© 2000 International Anesthesia Research Society


GENERAL ARTICLES

Effects of Nonimmobilizers and Halothane on Caenorhabditis elegans

Philip G. Morgan, MD, Gregory W. Radke, BA, and Margaret M. Sedensky, MD

Departments of Anesthesiology and Genetics, University Hospitals and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Philip G. Morgan, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, 2400 Bolwell Building, University Hospitals, 11100 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44106. Address e-mail to philip.morgan{at}uhhs.com

We studied the effects of two nonimmobilizers, a transitional compound, and halothane on the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans, by using reversible immobility as an end point. By themselves, the nonimmobilizers did not immobilize any of the four strains of animals tested. Toluene appears to be a transitional compound for all strains tested. The additive effects of the nonimmobilizers with halothane were also studied. Similar to results seen in studies of mice, the nonimmobilizers were antagonistic to halothane in the wild type nematode. However, the nonimmobilizers did not affect the 50% effective concentrations of halothane for two other mutant strains. For halothane, the slopes of the dose response curves were smaller in more sensitive strains compared with the wild type. As in mammals, nonimmobilizers antagonize the effects of halothane on the nematode, C. elegans. The variation in slopes in the response to halothane in different strains is consistent with multiple sites of action. These results support the use of C. elegans as a model for the study of anesthetics.

Implications: As in mammals, nonimmobilizers antagonize the effects of halothane on the nematode, C. elegans. The variation in slopes in the response to halothane in different strains is consistent with multiple sites of action. These results support the use of C. elegans as a model for the study of anesthetics.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
J. A. Humphrey, M. M. Sedensky, and P. G. Morgan
Understanding anesthesia: making genetic sense of the absence of senses
Hum. Mol. Genet., May 15, 2002; 11(10): 1241 - 1249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.