This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (80) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Keller, C. Articles by Loeckinger, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Keller, C. Articles by Loeckinger, A.

---

GENERAL ARTICLES

Does the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway Prevent Aspiration of Regurgitated Fluid?

Christian Keller, MD^*, Joseph Brimacombe, MB, ChB, FRCA, MD, Axel Kleinsasser, MD, and Alex Loeckinger, MD

*Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Leopold-Franzens University, Innsbruck, Austria; and Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Cairns Base Hospital, Cairns, Australia

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Brimacombe, MD, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Cairns Base Hospital, The Esplanade, Cairns 4870, Australia.

In this randomized, cross-over cadaver study, we determined whether a new airway device, the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA; Laryngeal Mask Company, Henley-on-Thames, UK), prevents aspiration of regurgitated fluid. We studied five male and five female cadavers (6–24 h postmortem). The infusion set of a pressure-controlled, continuous flow pump was inserted into the upper esophagus and ligated into place. Esophageal pressure (EP) was increased in 2-cm H₂O increments. This was performed without an airway device (control) and over a range of cuff volumes (0–40 mL) for the classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA), the PLMA with the drainage tube clamped (PLMA clamped) and unclamped (PLMA unclamped). The EP at which fluid was first seen with a fiberoptic scope in the hypopharynx (control), above or below the cuff, or in the drainage tube, was noted. Mean EP at which fluid was seen without any airway device was 9 (range 8–10) cm H₂O. EP at which fluid was seen was always higher for the PLMA clamped and LMA compared with the control (all, P < 0.0001). The mean EP at which fluid was seen for the PLMA unclamped was similar to the control at 10 (range 8–13) cm H₂O. For the PLMA unclamped, fluid appeared from the drainage tube in all cadavers at 10–40 mL cuff volume and in 8 of 10 cadavers at zero cuff volume. Mean EP at which fluid was seen above the cuff was similar for the PLMA clamped and LMA at 0–30 mL cuff volume, but was higher for PLMA clamped at 40-mL cuff volume (81 vs 48 cm H₂O, P = 0.006). Mean EP at which fluid was seen below the cuff was similar at 0–10 mL cuff volume, but was higher for the PLMA clamped at 20, 30, and 40 mL cuff volume (62, 68, 73 vs 46, 46, 46 cm H₂O, respectively, P < 0.04). For the PLMA clamped and the LMA, fluid appeared simultaneously above and below the cuff at all cuff volumes. We concluded that in the cadaver model, the correctly placed PLMA allows fluid in the esophagus to bypass the pharynx and mouth when the drainage tube is open. Both the LMA, and PLMA with a closed drainage tube, attenuate liquid flow between the esophagus and pharynx. This may have implications for airway protection in unconscious patients.

Implications: The correctly placed ProSeal laryngeal mask airway allows fluid in the esophagus to bypass the oropharynx in the cadaver model. This may have implications for airway protection in unconscious patients.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. Schmidbauer, S. Bercker, T. Volk, G. Bogusch, G. Mager, and T. Kerner Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-GelTM in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways ClassicTM and ProSealTM using a cadaver model Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2009; 102(1): 135 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Goldmann, C. Hechtfischer, A. Malik, A. Kussin, and C. Freisburger Use of ProSealTM Laryngeal Mask Airway in 2114 Adult Patients: A Prospective Study Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2008; 107(6): 1856 - 1861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Gibbison, T. M. Cook, and C. Seller Case series: protection from aspiration and failure of protection from aspiration with the i-gel airway Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2008; 100(3): 415 - 417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Bercker, W. Schmidbauer, T. Volk, G. Bogusch, H. P. Bubser, M. Hensel, and T. Kerner A Comparison of Seal in Seven Supraglottic Airway Devices Using a Cadaver Model of Elevated Esophageal Pressure Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2008; 106(2): 445 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. W. Li, F. S. Xue, Y. C. Xu, Y. Liu, P. Mao, K. P. Liu, Q. Y. Yang, G. H. Zhang, and H. T. Sun Cricoid Pressure Impedes Insertion of, and Ventilation Through, the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway in Anesthetized, Paralyzed Patients Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2007; 104(5): 1195 - 1198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J Hickman Prehospital advanced airway management for trauma in the United Kingdom: how, when and by whom? Trauma, July 1, 2006; 8(3): 169 - 177. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Goldmann, C. Roettger, and H. Wulf The Size 11/2 ProSealTM Laryngeal Mask Airway in Infants: A Randomized, Crossover Investigation with the ClassicTM Laryngeal Mask Airway Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2006; 102(2): 405 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Lopez-Gil, J. Brimacombe, and G. Garcia A randomized non-crossover study comparing the ProSealTM and ClassicTM laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized children Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2005; 95(6): 827 - 830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Cook, M. Asif, R. Sim, and J. Waldron Use of a ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway and a Ravussin cricothyroidotomy needle in the management of laryngeal and subglottic stenosis causing upper airway obstruction Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2005; 95(4): 554 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Goldmann and C. Jakob A Randomized Crossover Comparison of the Size 21/2 Laryngeal Mask Airway ProSealTM Versus Laryngeal Mask Airway-ClassicTM in Pediatric Patients Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2005; 100(6): 1605 - 1610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T Cook and T. Asai Who is at increased risk of pulmonary aspiration? Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2005; 94(5): 690 - 691. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Goldmann and C. Jakob Size 2 ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover investigation with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paediatric patients Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2005; 94(3): 385 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. von Goedecke, J. Brimacombe, C. Hormann, H. -C. Jeske, A. Kleinsasser, and C. Keller Pressure Support Ventilation Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation with the ProSealTM Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Randomized Crossover Study of Anesthetized Pediatric Patients Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2005; 100(2): 357 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C D Deakin, R Peters, P Tomlinson, and M Cassidy Securing the prehospital airway: a comparison of laryngeal mask insertion and endotracheal intubation by UK paramedics Emerg. Med. J., January 1, 2005; 22(1): 64 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Cook, J. P. Nolan, J. Brimacombe, and C. Keller Failed Obstetric Tracheal Intubation and Postoperative Respiratory Support with the Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway * Response Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2005; 100(1): 290 - 291. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Miller A Proposed Classification and Scoring System for Supraglottic Sealing Airways: A Brief Review Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2004; 99(5): 1553 - 1559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Keller, J. Brimacombe, J. Bittersohl, P. Lirk, and A. von Goedecke Aspiration and the laryngeal mask airway: three cases and a review of the literature Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2004; 93(4): 579 - 582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Keller, J. Brimacombe, P. Lirk, and F. Puhringer Failed Obstetric Tracheal Intubation and Postoperative Respiratory Support with the ProSealTM Laryngeal Mask Airway Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2004; 98(5): 1467 - 1470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Awan, J. P. Nolan, and T. M. Cook Use of a ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway for airway maintenance during emergency Caesarean section after failed tracheal intubation Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2004; 92(1): 144 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Ivascu Brown, P. Fogarty Mack, D. M. Mitera, and P. Dhar Use of the ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway in a pregnant patient with a difficult airway during electroconvulsive therapy Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2003; 91(5): 752 - 754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Brimacombe and C. Keller Aspiration of Gastric Contents During Use of a ProSealTM Laryngeal Mask Airway Secondary to Unidentified Foldover Malposition Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2003; 97(4): 1192 - 1194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Cook, M. Taylor, C. McKinstry, S. R. Laver, and J. P. Nolan Use of the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway to Initiate Ventilation During Intensive Care and Subsequent Percutaneous Tracheostomy Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2003; 97(3): 848 - 850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Kihara and J. Brimacombe Sex-Based ProSealTM Laryngeal Mask Airway Size Selection: A Randomized Crossover Study of Anesthetized, Paralyzed Male and Female Adult Patients Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2003; 97(1): 280 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Figueredo, M. Martinez, and T. Pintanel A Comparison of the ProSealTM Laryngeal Mask and the Laryngeal Tube(R) in Spontaneously Breathing Anesthetized Patients Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2003; 96(2): 600 - 605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Twigg and T. M. Cook Anaesthesia in an adult with Rubenstein-Taybi syndrome using the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2002; 89(5): 786 - 787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. P. Lu, J. Brimacombe, C. Yang, and M. Shyr ProSeal versus the Classic laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy{dagger} Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2002; 88(6): 824 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Cook, J. P. Nolan, C. Verghese, P. J. Strube, M. Lees, J. M. Millar, and P. J. F. Baskett Randomized crossover comparison of the ProSeal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2002; 88(4): 527 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. R. Evans, S. V. Gardner, and M. F. M. James ProSeal laryngeal mask protects against aspiration of fluid in the pharynx{dagger} Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2002; 88(4): 584 - 587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Keller, J. Brimacombe, A. Kleinsasser, and L. Brimacombe The Laryngeal Mask Airway ProSealTM as a Temporary Ventilatory Device in Grossly and Morbidly Obese Patients Before Laryngoscope-Guided Tracheal Intubation Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2002; 94(3): 737 - 740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. O'Connor Jr., S. R. Davies, and M. S. Stix ""Soap Bubbles"" and ""Gauze Thread"" Drain Tube Tests Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2001; 93(4): 1082 - 1082. [Full Text] [PDF]