JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zarauza, R.
Right arrow Articles by Monedero, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zarauza, R.
Right arrow Articles by Monedero, P.
Anesth Analg 2000;91:938-943
© 2000 International Anesthesia Research Society


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE

A Comparative Study with Oral Nifedipine, Intravenous Nimodipine, and Magnesium Sulfate in Postoperative Analgesia

Rosina Zarauza, MD, PhD, Ana N. Sáez-Fernández, MD, PhD, María J. Iribarren, MD, PhD, Francisco Carrascosa, MD, PhD, María Adame, MD, PhD, Isabel Fidalgo, MD, and Pablo Monedero, MD, PhD

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Rosina Zarauza, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, E-31080 Pamplona, Spain. Address e-mail to rzarauza{at}unav.es

We tested the ability of two L-type calcium channel blockers (nifedipine and nimodipine) and the N-methyl D-aspartate natural antagonist magnesium to decrease morphine requirements and pain in the postoperative period in 92 patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. In a randomized, double-blinded study, patients were assigned to one of four groups. The control group received placebo. The nifedipine group received 60 mg of oral nifedipine. The magnesium group received an initial dose of 30 mg/kg followed by 10 mg · kg-1 · h-1 of magnesium sulfate over 20 h. The nimodipine group received 30 µg · kg-1 · h-1 of nimodipine over 20 h. Postoperative morphine consumption was assessed for 48 h. Pain at rest and pain on movement were assessed up to the fifth day postsurgery. There were no differences among groups in postoperative morphine consumption at 12 and 24 h. The nifedipine group consumed more morphine than the control and nimodipine groups during 24–48 h. Pain at rest scores were higher at 16 and 24 h in the nifedipine group than in the other three groups. Pain on movement scores were lower at 72 h in the nimodipine group than in the control and nifedipine groups. In conclusion, the perioperative application of oral nifedipine, IV nimodipine, or IV magnesium sulfate failed to decrease postoperative morphine requirements after colorectal surgery.

Implications: The increase of intracellular calcium plays a key role in spinal transmission of pain and in the establishment of central sensitization. We examined the effects of nifedipine, nimodipine, and magnesium sulfate in postoperative analgesia after colorectal surgery. We found no differences in morphine consumption with the administration of each drug alone.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. R. Tramer and C. J. Glynn
An Evaluation of a Single Dose of Magnesium to Supplement Analgesia After Ambulatory Surgery: Randomized Controlled Trial
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2007; 104(6): 1374 - 1379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. Lysakowski, L. Dumont, C. Czarnetzki, and M. R. Tramer
Magnesium as an Adjuvant to Postoperative Analgesia: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2007; 104(6): 1532 - 1539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. Casey, S.-A. Nortcliffe, P. Sharpe, and D. J. Buggy
Perioperative Nimodipine and Postoperative Analgesia
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2006; 102(2): 504 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. J. L. McCartney, A. Sinha, and J. Katz
A Qualitative Systematic Review of the Role of N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Antagonists in Preventive Analgesia
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2004; 98(5): 1385 - 1400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.