JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mascia, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mascia, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, R. A.
Anesth Analg 2000;91:1289-1293
© 2000 International Anesthesia Research Society


GENERAL ARTICLES

The Anesthetic Potency of Propanol and Butanol Versus Propanethiol and Butanethiol in {alpha}1 Wild Type and {alpha}1(S267Q) Glycine Receptors

Maria Paola Mascia, PhD*, Diane H. Gong, BS{dagger}, Edmond I Eger, II, MD{dagger}, and R. Adron Harris, PhD*

*Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas; and {dagger}Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Maria Paola Mascia, PhD, Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas, 2500 Speedway MBB 1.124, Austin, TX 78712-1095. Address e-mail to mariapaola{at}mail.utexas.edu

Although similar in shape and size, and although differing only by substitution of a sulfur atom for an oxygen atom, propanethiol and butanethiol differ markedly from propanol and butanol in their in vivo potency and physical properties. Recent theories of narcosis suggest that anesthetics may act by enhancing the effect of inhibitory agonists, such as glycine, on their receptors. We tested whether propanol, butanol, propanethiol, and butanethiol enhance the effect of glycine on {alpha}1 glycine receptors expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes in a manner that reflects the in vivo differences found for potencies. As anticipated, we found an immediate parallel between in vivo (rat minimum alveolar concentration of anesthetic required to eliminate movement in response to a noxious stimulus in 50% of subjects) and in vitro (recombinant receptor) effects. All four compounds enhanced the effect of glycine on wild type receptors, and the extent of enhancement for a given minimum alveolar concentration-multiple was approximately the same for all compounds. We also found that propanethiol, butanethiol, propanol, and butanol did not affect, or minimally affected, the action of glycine in anesthetic resistant mutants in which the amino acid serine at position 267 was replaced by glutamine [{alpha}1(S267Q)].

Implications: The in vivo potencies of propanethiol, butanethiol, propanol, and butanol correlate with their capacities to enhance the effect of glycine on {alpha}1 glycine receptors expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. These results support the notion that a protein mediates anesthetic action.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Jenkins, I. A. Lobo, D. Gong, J. R. Trudell, K. Solt, R. A. Harris, and E. I. Eger II
General Anesthetics Have Additive Actions on Three Ligand Gated Ion Channels
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 486 - 493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Jung, M. H. Akabas, and R. A. Harris
Functional and Structural Analysis of the GABAA Receptor {alpha}1 Subunit during Channel Gating and Alcohol Modulation
J. Biol. Chem., January 7, 2005; 280(1): 308 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
G. S. Findlay, R. Phelan, M. T. Roberts, G. E. Homanics, S. E. Bergeson, G. F. Lopreato, S. J. Mihic, Y. A. Blednov, and R. A. Harris
Glycine Receptor Knock-In Mice and Hyperekplexia-Like Phenotypes: Comparisons with the Null Mutant
J. Neurosci., September 3, 2003; 23(22): 8051 - 8059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. M. Sonner, J. F. Antognini, R. C. Dutton, P. Flood, A. T. Gray, R. A. Harris, G. E. Homanics, J. Kendig, B. Orser, D. E. Raines, et al.
Inhaled Anesthetics and Immobility: Mechanisms, Mysteries, and Minimum Alveolar Anesthetic Concentration
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2003; 97(3): 718 - 740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2000 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.